Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby arnnatz » Wed May 09, 2012 4:55 am

crankyhead wrote:So, to believe in your conclusion, I should just ignore 2 centuries of history? Is that how it works in GOP land?


During the 2 centuries of racism you are referring to, which party in the united states was the racist party? Are you saying we should just ignore the democrat history in the United States? Is that how it works in Lib land?
arnnatz
User avatar
PolitiMaster
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:54 am

Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby KALKAM » Wed May 09, 2012 11:08 am

arnnatz wrote:
crankyhead wrote:So, to believe in your conclusion, I should just ignore 2 centuries of history? Is that how it works in GOP land?


During the 2 centuries of racism you are referring to, which party in the united states was the racist party? Are you saying we should just ignore the democrat history in the United States? Is that how it works in Lib land?


It's funny isn't it! Ignore the 2 centuries of Democrats fighting to preserve slavery, the creation of the KKK, opposing Civil Rights, deliberately creating dependency, using preachers to mislead people but focus on no black presidents until the DNC put a radical leftist in to follow Pelosi and Frank's directions!

AWESOME!!!!

This is actually how they think!
KALKAM
User avatar
PolitiNoob
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:36 am

Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby KALKAM » Wed May 09, 2012 11:35 am

KALKAM wrote:


The history should be available on every page of this thread in case some join in late...wouldn't want the left taking advantage of people that weren't around long enough to know when they are lying to refocus their despicable history onto someone else!
KALKAM
User avatar
PolitiNoob
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:36 am

Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby WTFO » Wed May 09, 2012 10:10 pm

crankyhead wrote:
arnnatz wrote:Wow, the us is less racist than canada. We are 1 - 0


Actually, if you could be bothered to learn some history, Canada was the destination, where all the black slaves in America used to escape to, because my country has never had an issue with slavery.


Really, troll boy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Canada
-----------------
Slavery in what now comprises Canada existed into the 1830s, when slavery was officially abolished. Some slaves were of African descent, while others were aboriginal (typically called panis, likely a corruption of Pawnee). Slavery which was practiced within Canada's current geography, was practiced primarily by Aboriginal groups. While there was never any significant Canadian trade in African slaves, native nations frequently enslaved their rivals and a very modest number (sometimes none in a number of years) were purchased by colonial administrators (rarely by settlers) until 1833, when the slave trade was abolished across the British Empire.

A few dozen African slaves were forcibly brought as chattel by Europeans to New France, Acadia and the later British North America (see chattel slavery) during the 17th century, but large-scale plantation slavery of the sort that existed in most European colonies in the Americas, from New York to Brazil, never existed in colonial Canada or Newfoundland because the economies were not based on plantation agriculture. The largest industries were based upon the exploitation of natural resources, such as the fur trade. So, while some Canadian slaves performed agricultural labour, most were domestic house servants.

Because early Canada's role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade was so minor, the history of slavery in Canada is often overshadowed by the more tumultuous slavery practiced elsewhere in the Americas - most famously in the American South, and infamously in the colonial Caribbean. Afua Cooper states that slavery is, "Canada's best kept secret", locked within the National closet

Under indigenous rule

Slave-owning people of what became Canada were, for example, the fishing societies, such as the Yurok, that lived along the Pacific coast from Alaska to California. Many of the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, such as the Haida and Tlingit, were traditionally known as fierce warriors and slave-traders, raiding as far as California. Slavery was hereditary, the slaves being prisoners of war and their descendants were slaves.

Among some Pacific Northwest tribes about a quarter of the population were slaves. One slave narrative was composed by an Englishman, John R. Jewitt, who had been taken alive when his ship was captured in 1802; his memoir provides a detailed look at life as a slave, and asserts that a large number were held.

Under French rule

Main article: Slavery in New France

In 1628 the first recorded slave in Canada was brought by a British Convoy to New France. Olivier le Jeune was the name given to the boy originally from Madagascar. His given name resonates with the Code Noir. Although loosely established, the Code Noir forced baptisms and decreed the conversion of all slaves to Catholicism.

By 1688, New France's population was 11,562 people, made up primarily of fur traders, missionaries, and farmers settled along the St. Lawrence Valley. To help overcome its severe shortage of servants and laborers, King Louis XIV granted New France's petition to import black slaves from West Africa. While slavery was prohibited in France, it was permitted in its colonies as a means of providing the massive labour force needed to clear land, construct buildings and (in the Caribbean colonies) work sugar plantation. New France soon established its own 'Code Noir,' defining the control and management of slaves. The Code in 1685 set the pattern for policing slavery. It required that all slaves be instructed as Catholics and not as Protestants. It concentrated on defining the condition of slavery, and established harsh controls. Slaves had virtually no rights, though the Code did enjoin masters to take care of the sick and old. The blacks were usually called "servants," and the harsh gang system was not used. Death rates among slaves was high.

Marie-Joseph Angélique was the black slave of a rich widow in Montreal. According to a published account of her life by Afua Cooper, in 1734, after learning that she was going to be sold and separated from her lover,[9] she set fire to her owner's house and escaped. The fire raged out of control, destroying forty-six buildings. Captured two months later, Marie-Joseph was paraded through the city, then tortured until she confessed her crime. In the afternoon of the day of execution, Angélique was taken one last time through the streets of Montreal and, after the stop at the church for her amende honorable mounted a scaffold facing the ruins of the buildings destroyed by the fire and there was hanged, then strangled until dead, her body flung into the fire and the ashes scattered in the wind.

Under British rule

Black slaves lived in the British regions of Canada in the 17th and 18th centuries — 104 were listed in a 1767 census of Nova Scotia, but their numbers were small until the United Empire Loyalist influx after 1783. As white Loyalists fled the new American Republic, they took with them about 2000 black slaves: 1200 to the Maritimes (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island), 300 to Lower Canada (Quebec), and 500 to Upper Canada (Ontario). The Imperial Act of 1790 assured prospective immigrants that their slaves would remain their property. As under French rule, Loyalist slaves were held in small numbers and were employed as domestic servants, farm hands, and skilled artisans.

The 1763 Treaty of Paris made no reference to slavery in Canada, nor does the Quebec Act of 1774 or the Treaty of Paris of 1783 -- either to ban it or to permit it.

Canadian First Nations owned or traded in slaves. Shawnee, Potawatomi, and other western tribes imported slaves from Ohio and Kentucky and sold them to Canadian settlers. Thayendenaga (chief Joseph Brant) used blacks he had captured during the American Revolution to build Brant House at Burlington Beach and a second home near Brantford. In all, Brant owned about forty black slaves.

The system of gang labor, and its consequent institutions of control and brutality, did not develop in Canada as it did in the USA. Because they did not appear to pose a threat to their masters, slaves were permitted to learn to read and write, Christian conversion was encouraged, and their marriages were recognized by law.

By 1790 the abolition movement was gaining credence in Canada and the ill intent of slavery was evidenced by an incident involving a slave woman being violently abused by her slave owner on her way to being sold in the United States. In 1793 Chloe Clooey, in an act of defiance yelled out screams of resistance. The abuse committed by her slave owner and her violent resistance was witnessed by Peter Martin and William Grisely. Peter Martin, a former slave, brought the incident to the attention of Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe. Under the auspices of Simcoe, The Slave Act of 1793 was legislated. The elected members of the executive council, many of whom were merchants or farmers who depended on slave labour, saw no need for emancipation. White later wrote that there was "much opposition but little argument" to his measure. Finally the Assembly passed the Act Against Slavery that legislated the gradual abolition of slavery: no slaves could be imported; slaves already in the province would remain enslaved until death, no new slaves could be brought into Upper Canada, and children born to female slaves would be slaves but must be freed at age 25. To discourage manumission, the Act required the master to provide security that the former slave would not become a public charge. The compromise Slave Act of 1793 stands as the only attempt by any Canadian legislature to act against slavery. This legal rule ensured the eventual end of slavery in Upper Canada, although as it diminished the sale value of slaves within the province it also resulted in slaves being sold to the United States. In 1798 there was an attempt by a lobby groups to rectify the legislation and import more slaves.

By 1800 the other provinces of British North America had effectively limited slavery through court decisions requiring the strictest proof of ownership, which was rarely available. Slavery remained legal, however, until the British Parliament's Slavery Abolition Act finally abolished slavery in all parts of the British Empire effective August 1, 1834.

The Sierra Leone Company was established to relocate groups of formerly enslaved Africans, nearly 1,200 Black Nova Scotians, most of whom had escaped enslavement in the United States. Given the most barren land in Nova Scotia, many had died from the harsh winters there. They established a settlement in the existing colony in Sierra Leone (already established to home the 'poor blacks' of London) at Freetown in 1792. Many of the "Black poor" were African Americans, who had been promised their freedom for joining the British Army during the American Revolution, but also included other African and Asian inhabitants of London. The Freetown settlement was joined, particularly after 1834, by other groups of freed Africans and became the first African-American haven for formerly enslaved Africans.

Today there are four remaining slave cemeteries in Canada: in St.-Armand, Quebec, Shelburne, Nova Scotia and Priceville and Dresden in Ontario.

Around the time of the Emancipation, the Underground Railroad network was established in the United States, particularly Ohio, where slaves would cross into the Northern States over the Ohio River en route to various settlements and towns in Upper Canada (known as Canada West from 1841 to 1867, now Ontario).
-------------------

Yet another troll lie completely exposed. This is just too easy. :owned:

idiot, lying troll
WTFO
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:32 pm

Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby GrandpaGreer » Fri May 11, 2012 5:12 am

Very interesting, Mr. FO! May I call you WT?
I never knew that about Canada. In the discussions I have had with Canadians with which I work, it is always about either how can we possibly allow the people to own and <GASP> carry concealed weapons in public or how the racial divide in the US is our own fault due to the policy of slavery...this usually said with a slight upturning of the nose and a note of superiority in the voice...of course, that could just be my imagination. Many Canadians, even those I love like family, always ask about the negative things they have heard and want to verify or they love to tell me how Canada is better than the US. It's OK. I am proud to set them straight about our country and I love to hear the good things about theirs.
GrandpaGreer
User avatar
PolitiSeedling
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby KALKAM » Fri May 11, 2012 9:18 am

GrandpaGreer wrote:... or how the racial divide in the US is our own fault due to the policy of slavery...


The divide is caused by critical theory being part of the curriculum.

They can't really talk about Slavery much now because the GOP abolished it while the Dems created the KKK.

Too bad that the slaves weren't armed...they would never have been slaves. Everyone has a right to defend themselves...EVERYONE.

Some would disagree though...so they play on tragedies.

I love Canada...the people are for the most part really friendly. I don't blame them for what our twisted media and professors mislead them into thinking. They mean well and when hearing their lies they naturally want to be on the right side...and it's exploited by those seeking a revolution.
KALKAM
User avatar
PolitiNoob
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:36 am

Re: Democrats, the KKK, Slavery, and denying civil rights.

Postby arnnatz » Mon May 14, 2012 5:57 am

These are from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2011/jus/J3-8-1994-6-eng.pdf and prove crackheads point that canada is country without hate crimes or prejudice.

Attacks against homosexuals have been reported by others. For example, in Montreal, incidents of "gay-bashing" reported by the press include not only assaults but, in some cases, the killing of homosexuals. One Canadian legal commentator has recently stated that "t is not hyperbole to assert that queer-bashing is a social phenomenon of epidemic proportions".

In January 1993, seven Montreal-area synagogues were defaced with swastikas and a Nazi slogan. The attacks, which appeared to be orchestrated, were described as the worst acts of anti-Semitic vandalism in Quebec in nearly three years.

In June 1993, a Tamil who had left Sri Lanka to escape the ethnic strife there was viciously attacked by three men, whom he had never seen before, at the end of his work shift at a Toronto restaurant. Police said the attack was racially motivated. A 19-year-old skinhead linked to white supremacist organizations was subsequently charged with aggravated assault and denied bail

Canada has a long history of hate-motivated violence towards racial or ethnic minorities. For example, in 1907 in Vancouver, a mob of whites attacked the Chinese and Japanese communities, causing at least extensive damage to stores and, it was claimed by one report, "several fatalities".

During World War II, members of the Japanese Canadian community were interned and their property confiscated.

In the 1970s, a series of subway attacks against members of the South Asian community in Toronto helped to result in creation of a task force to study that problem.
In a 1980 study on interracial conflict in Canada,

Dhiru Patel pointed out that:
Historically, ... established leaders in Canadian society (both individual and institutional) have made key contributions to interracial violence, for example, to the anti-Chinese riot of 1887 and the anti-Chinese/Japanese riot of 1907 in Vancouver. In both cases, the local newspapers, respectable individuals (businessmen, clergymen, politicians) and organizations played a very prominent role in at least preparing the groundwork and instigating the violence, which claimed "scores" of Chinese lives. The timing of the riots seems to have been related to white workers' alleged fears of economic competition, especially at a time of recession ...

[i]There is much more in the document, but I think it does, indeed, prove crackhead's point about the lack of racism and bigotry in canada
arnnatz
User avatar
PolitiMaster
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:54 am

Previous
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Options

Return to PolitiChat

cron