Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby crankyhead » Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:32 pm

Guy says the word 's***' at the 0:12 mark. Other than that, the language is clean as a whistle. Enjoy, and happy holidays.

"Because what good are the first amendment freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and redress of grievances, if you can't keep a magnum in the nightstand?" - Roy Zimmerman
crankyhead
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby crankyhead » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:56 am

"Because what good are the first amendment freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and redress of grievances, if you can't keep a magnum in the nightstand?" - Roy Zimmerman
crankyhead
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby WTFO » Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:37 pm

Even more proof of the kind of scum that is a significant part of the OWS losers:

------------------

Occupiers Accused of Desecrating Churches in NYC That Took Them In
Posted on January 23, 2012 at 8:16am by Mike Opelka

Since Zuccotti Park and New York City ended the overnight stays of the Occupy Wall Street crowds, the protesters have been sleeping anywhere they can. Some have been taken in by local supporters while others have been able to sleep in area churches. However, thanks to serious allegations of vandalism and desecration, the churches have begun to close their doors to the occupiers.

The New York Post reports that the sacred baptismal font of the West Park Presbyterian Church on 86th Street was vandalized just three weeks after an expensive MacBook laptop went missing from the church office.

Rev. Bob Brashear has been hosting upwards of 60 occupiers each night, allowing them to sleep between the pews. But the welcome mat has been rolled up and the pastor has given the protesters two weeks notice to find another place to sleep.

Brashear’s message to the occupiers:

“It was like pissing on the 99%.”

Rabbi Chaim Gruber of Brooklyn also sent a note to the Post claiming that occupiers have defiled a church in the area:

“The Park Slope church housing occupiers was desecrated when an occupier peed inside the building and the pee came in contact with a cross.”

----------------------

I guess with these kind of idiots, no act of kindness goes un-punished.
WTFO
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:32 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby WTFO » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:11 pm

More proof of how vile the OWS douche canoes really are:

--------------

Occupy Wall Street protesters throw condoms, drown out speakers at Rhode Island pro-life rally
by Ben Johnson
Mon Jan 30, 2012 09:59 EST

PROVIDENCE, RI, January 30, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – Demonstrators from the Occupy Wall Street movement threw condoms on Catholic schoolgirls, refused to allow a Catholic priest to give a closing prayer, and shouted down a pro-life speaker at a Rhode Island right to life rally on Thursday, according to its organizer. The event marked the third time protesters associated with the movement have disrupted a pro-life meeting in a week.

About two-dozen members of Occupy Providence hiked from Burnside Park to the 39th Annual Pro-Life State House Rally organized by the Rhode Island State Right to Life Committee on Thursday.

The pro-life organization’s executive director, Barth E. Bracy, told LifeSiteNews.com that, near the end of the rally, the Occupiers “strategically fanned out with military precision.”

That’s when they “started showering condoms down on some of the girls from a Catholic high school.”

They gathered around speakers at the podium, shouting them down or otherwise jostling them and members of the audience.

Bracy, who finished only a quarter of his keynote address before being drowned out by chants and catcalls, said the Occupiers – who carried a large sign reading “Occupy Providence” and wore distinguishing arm bands – physically bumped several people. “They’re touching you. They’re swarming you,” he said.

The Providence chapter openly planned its actions on its Facebook page, Bracy said.

Bracy said he was disappointed when he tried to ask a man from the national Occupy Wall Street movement, who identified himself as “Dallas,” what opposing the right to life had to do with economics. http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/why-do ... g-abortion “You can’t have a reasoned conversation with these people,” he said, “They simply try to taunt you. They’re smug, snarky, arrogant. You won’t get a straight answer.”

Dallas told Bracy he was on a 13-city national tour to teach Saul Alinsky tactics to local organizers.

“Their actions have made it loud and clear, whatever else they are, they are pro-abortion – and they are willing to attack the pro-life movement,” Bracy told LifeSiteNews.

Members of the Occupy movement, which putatively focuses on economic and financial issues, have begun aggressively demonstrating against those who advocate for the rights of the unborn.

Approximately 15 protesters from Occupy D.C. disrupted the March for Life Youth Rally in the nation’s capital last Saturday evening.

Last Monday, they disrupted a prayer service for the unborn in front of the Supreme Court.

“What they did yesterday was clearly the most outrageous and egregious thing they’ve done so far,” Bracy said on Friday. “I don’t know if this is a sign of what’s to come from them, but I think it’s important Catholics and pro-lifers know who these people are.”

However, such outrageous and offensive tactics may prove counterproductive for the pro-abortion movement. “They couldn’t have done us a bigger favor,” Bracy said. “We’re more popular with the legislators than we’ve ever been, because they’re absolutely appalled at their behavior.”

--------------------

Kick these scumbags out of public areas. Their illegal actions deserve jail time. Anyone still supporting these morons needs psychiatric help (like most of the mainstream media).
WTFO
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:32 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby WTFO » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:19 pm

OWS related video. Enjoy:

WTFO
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:32 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby crankyhead » Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:06 pm

Image

Unregulated capitalism in all it's cannibalistic glory.
"Because what good are the first amendment freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and redress of grievances, if you can't keep a magnum in the nightstand?" - Roy Zimmerman
crankyhead
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby WTFO » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:58 pm

Another example of the types of violent thugs in the OWS crowd:

-------------------


OWS Letter to the Editor in USA Today: We Will Storm Wall Street With Guns

Posted by Ben Shapiro Feb 21st 2012 at 2:09 pm in Mainstream Media, Occupy Wall Street, Politics, media bias |

Over at USA Today, a self-employed massage therapist from Austin, TX has a letter to the editor responding to an editorial suggesting that Occupy Wall Street has lost its way.

Here’s what this fellow wrote:

USA TODAY’s editorial is right to say that Occupy might lack clear goals on how to move forward, but the movement has accomplished its main original goal: to protest these injustices, not by simply holding a rally and going home, but by keeping the rally going to underscore the seriousness of this problem. Your piece accuses the protesters of sitting around and doing nothing. So maybe they should take up their Second Amendment-sanctioned guns and storm Wall Street and our nation’s capitals. If our country doesn’t change, it could very well come to that one day.

Notice the language here. Rich Latta, the author, threatens outright to head to Wall Street with firearms. Janet Napolitano, where are you? He says they out to head to Washington, D.C. packing heat. Secret Service, you’re being paged.

The irony here, of course, is that the mainstream media prints these sorts of letters without a second thought so long as they spring from OWS – and that nobody seems to care. If this had come from the tea party, it would be front page news at Huffington Post. Instead, it’s buried in the editorial page of USA Today, and disappears into the ether. Yes, Virginia, there is such a thing as leftist media bias.

http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/ ... with-guns/
------------------------

Sounds like the advocacy for a violent overthrow of the US govt. I have no problem being part of the military force to defend against this type of domestic enemy to the Constitution.
WTFO
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:32 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby crankyhead » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:15 am

WTFO wrote:Sounds like the advocacy for a violent overthrow of the US govt. I have no problem being part of the military force to defend against this type of domestic enemy to the Constitution.


As long as it's some Tea Partier, or some libertarian, advocating the violent overthrow of the US gov't, there's no problems there, am I correct?

Or maybe you're suggesting that second amendment rights only apply to radical christian conservatives?

Could you clarify this, I don't want to be making any false assumptions about your position.
"Because what good are the first amendment freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly and redress of grievances, if you can't keep a magnum in the nightstand?" - Roy Zimmerman
crankyhead
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby WTFO » Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:02 pm

Once again my point on how liberals cannot discuss a topic without resorting to pathetic logic fallacies has been proved. In this case, a lie about my position by insinuating that I wouldn't be concerned about the violent overthrow of the govt if it came from a conservative group. Then a lie about my position by suggesting that I believe 2nd Amendment rights are reserved for christian conservatives. Your typical strawman arguments to fight since he doesn't have the courage, facts or evidence to discuss my post.

Liberal morons are still not worth my time or attention.

"Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
WTFO
User avatar
PolitiGod
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:32 pm

Re: Who are the Wall Street Occupiers?

Postby GrouchoMarxist » Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:14 pm

crankyhead wrote:
WTFO wrote:Sounds like the advocacy for a violent overthrow of the US govt. I have no problem being part of the military force to defend against this type of domestic enemy to the Constitution.


As long as it's some Tea Partier, or some libertarian, advocating the violent overthrow of the US gov't, there's no problems there, am I correct?

Or maybe you're suggesting that second amendment rights only apply to radical christian conservatives?

Could you clarify this, I don't want to be making any false assumptions about your position.


How many people do you suck on everyday?

How many violent tea party members have been arrested yet?
GrouchoMarxist
User avatar
PolitiMaster
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:02 pm

PreviousNext
Forum Statistics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Options

Return to PolitiChat

cron