Motifake
politics
epic fail
military funny
stupid human
ufo
MAD
politifake

Latest comments




PREV PAGE

JGalt - Mar 21, 2013 2:23am, #50267

watch out- Bill Maher could actually become a conservative! http://www.gopusa.com/freshink/2013/03/20/bill-maher-is-upset-over-taxes/?subscriber=1

JGalt - Mar 21, 2013 12:29am, #50266

Could be why congress always avoids declaring war- then no war crimes!

JGalt - Mar 21, 2013 12:27am, #50265

great series, keep up the good work!

JGalt - Mar 21, 2013 12:24am, #50264

some people stopped drinking the kool aid in the 90's

Texmil - Mar 20, 2013 11:19pm, #50263

It's falling fast because he balloned it up so big initially. Even a small decrease would be fast. Debt still continues to climb regardless.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 4:05pm, #50262

Liberals: we don't confuse "than" with "then."

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:56pm, #50261

Still waiting for your proof that I committed copyright infringement. Bro.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:48pm, #50260

Now that is simply not true: because the law is always supported by an ignorant majority as well as staunch acolytes much like yourself.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:45pm, #50259

Great language. Seals the quality of your character. Create? Is that what you call sticking words on other people's ph**os? I simply asked you to provide proof of unconstitutional actions. Your ignorance is a greater threat than any law ever could be.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:36pm, #50258

Why yes, I am great, f***ing awesome, in fact, as opposing to a malingering twat such as yourself who likes to criticize because he can't create himself.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:32pm, #50257

I still have to work for money like everyone else. You're really gouging the bottom of the barrel here, dude. If you don't like my poster, feel free to vote it down, and I'll await your first papers accusing me of copyright infringement, mm'kay?

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:30pm, #50256

I use my time as I see fit. And it has been enlightening to see how ignorant you truly are. Not only about our legal system but also about life in general. When you can argue your case well...come find me. (Btw, you're here too so you must be a great ...)

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:30pm, #50255

If you're so d*** great, why you wasting your time here, and not fighting that evil, evil socialist-communist policy called "Obamacare." Perhaps if you work for-profit, you might be more motivated to get the job done, I'm sure.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:28pm, #50254

We are not rich by any stretch. In fact I bet you make more an hour than I do.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:28pm, #50253

Oh, you're a pro-bono lawyer, no wonder you have so much free time to come onto a image-posting site and argue with an armchair propagandist like me. You should probably find a more productive line of work, dude.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:27pm, #50252

How much work would you do because you believe that what you are doing is right and just? How Much pro bono work do you do??? Yet I'm the parasite.

foxrecon19d - Mar 20, 2013 3:25pm, #50251

***snicker*** said the Obama-worshipping sycophants who are constantly whining about how guns are out to get them.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:25pm, #50250

Can't deal with your own issues still? Parasite? Maybe you don't know how constitutional legal councils work, so ill explain it to you. 98% of the cases we take are pro bono. (As in my firm not I get paid at all, even if we win)

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:22pm, #50249

Now who's the angry one?

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:21pm, #50248

First off I'm not your bro. Secondly, anyone who questions my love of country and liberty gets the brunt of my anger. Lastly, classy way of using ignorant slang.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:21pm, #50247

"Plagiarism and ignorance," huh? You'll accuse me of that, yet look the other way when Battaile does it? Since you are a lawyer, why don't you file a suit against me for copyright infringement and see how far this goes, you fascist parasite.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:19pm, #50246

umadbro?

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:18pm, #50245

You are the armchair activist who sits back and makes posters based on ignorance and skewed opinions. My love for country is signed in blood while yours is posted in plagiarism and ignorance.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:18pm, #50244

Oh, you're a lawyer now, why I had no idea. In fact, I bet you work for NORML, too, an organization which has been fighting the draconian drug policy of the Drug War for about 40 years now. But since it does not fit your narrow view, I doubt you do,

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:17pm, #50243

I actually voted for Ron Paul and completely disagree with the current administration on many issues. I sir have served 2 tours in our military, shed blood 3x from enemy fire, and seen many of my friends die in combat. Don't question my love for liberty.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:15pm, #50242

Now I'm illiterate? Why the name calling? I simply want you to prove to me that you are correct about their being something unconstitutional about this situation. If there is, I will champion it from my firm through the 10th circuit all the way to DC.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:14pm, #50241

Wow, I had no idea how much you hated freedom and liberty, man. You clearly are an Obama voter.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:13pm, #50240

A drug raid took place, people were arrested, taken to trial, a plea was entered and then the case heard by a judge and jury of peers. Don't break the law and you have no problems. Want the law changed, follow the process to have it changed.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:11pm, #50239

I have explained at length my position, I can't be faulted if you insist on backpedaling, deflection, and illiteracy, in addition to your morally absolutist and legally dogmatic perspective on government charters and public policy. That's my retort.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:11pm, #50238

You claim violations yet have not produced one iota of proof for your claims other than you don't like it, which in your mind seems to make things unconstitutional. Laws are in place for a reason. If you break them you are punished.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:08pm, #50237

It is obvious that you are not capable of having a logical conversation without being rude. My interpretation of the constitution rests with the justices of that court. You claim unconstitutional actions yet I see no rulings. This is my support.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 3:06pm, #50236

Was he on the Supreme Court when he wrote this? No he was not. Again. Please stick to task...it seems you are trying to cloud the original issue I took with your poster as it refers to the constitutionality of arresting people for violating drug laws.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 3:00pm, #50235

informed interpretation of the Constitution yourself, in general or in direct relation to the issue currently being discussed. Your lack of substantial contraposition, if not an act of adamant trolling, is certainly an act of persistent retardation, sir.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 2:59pm, #50234

I have been backing up my arguments, you're the one using the wimpy deflection of calling my arguments "emotional" when I have made plenty of citations, which, by the way, outnumber yours. You rely heavily on Supreme Court opinion without making any.....

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 2:58pm, #50233

In Robinson v. California, the Supreme Court ruled that it is not illegal to be a drug addict, ergo, you can ingest any substance you want. The opinion was maintained in "Powell v. Texas."

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 2:57pm, #50232

The quotation marks that you have been using? You use them sometimes. Sometimes you only use one set. Again with the personal attacks. Why? I'm simply asking you to back up your argument and your words yet you resort to attacks of my person.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 2:54pm, #50231

Oh, you want cases. Well, why didn't you say so, man. Here's the ruling by DEA Judge Francis Young on the reclassification of weed: http://www.ebeneezer.net/ritual/vegetable/jyp2.html

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 2:52pm, #50230

Sir, I am well aware of the process of law and the system in place in this country. And yet you again try to change the subject. Where are the cases that these have been reviewed and found unconstitutional? No need to be rude, just answer the questions.

Cannabal - Mar 20, 2013 2:51pm, #50229

I know the quotations marks are small, but they are there. Methinks you need Obamacare to get an appointment with an opthalmologist or an optometrist.

TheConstitutionalist - Mar 20, 2013 2:50pm, #50228

None of these arguments you are making speak to the constitutionality of the issues you originally raised. You are not answering the questions but are throwing other things into the mix.

NEXT PAGE


Skip to page

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990