Motifake
politics
epic fail
military funny
stupid human
ufo
MAD
politifake

Latest comments




PREV PAGE

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 9:51am, #52995

Which sounds perfectly reasonable, except that Intelligent Design 1) has no scientific basis, and 2) is just Creationism with a different label. Thus, as a religious belief, it has no place in public schools.

falconfan00 - Apr 24, 2013 9:39am, #52994

Not exactly sure why you'd 'slap him in the face' with the Constitution... If schools are to be a marketplace of ideas, i wouldn't see why 'Intelligent Design' couldn't be included as one of those ideas.

falconfan00 - Apr 24, 2013 9:30am, #52993

Agreed. Sad, frustrating, troubling.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 9:28am, #52992

Being large corporations, they wouldn't make as much money if they legitimately told the truth and just gave factually accurate details all the time.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 9:27am, #52991

While I'm sure there's exceptions to it, I can't really think of any. Some are of course much worse than others, even to the point of literally making things up, but basically just about all of them do it to at least some degree.

twill1962 - Apr 24, 2013 9:12am, #52990

I agree, whole-heartedly!

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 9:11am, #52989

As I said in less detail just a few posts up... It's a misconception that the argument is that global climate change (not "global warming" which is an inaccurate name) is entirely man made. The issue is that humans are impacting how it is happening.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 9:07am, #52988

Yeah... that is what I've basically been saying, in response to Jgalt suggesting muslims as a whole aren't opposed to the crazy ones that kill people and blow things up. And that similar inaccurate statements can be made for any group, ex: christians.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 9:05am, #52987

You did a good job implying it. Unless your goal is to completely avoid answering relevant questions.

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 9:00am, #52986

By that definition, I think we can safely dismiss all the 'news' programs as being a news program. Whether it is selective editing or opinion based reporting, right? They all are guilty of adding their slant/take on things.

OTC - Apr 24, 2013 8:54am, #52985

Its just common sense that man was not industrialized 10,000 yrs ago when the earth warmed up ending the Ice Age, so why do liberals think man is causing warming today?

OTC - Apr 24, 2013 8:51am, #52984

I didn't give an answer, but thanks for a s s u m i n g.

StoneTools - Apr 24, 2013 8:44am, #52983

Kind of my point. When you compare a single group of idiots like WBC (a small subset of christians) to a large set like muslims, it's a pretty shaky statement.

StoneTools - Apr 24, 2013 8:42am, #52982

I had to give this one a 3. If you had used "steal" instead of "do", I would have gladly given it a 5.

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 8:40am, #52981

Again, please enlighten us on which "rule" was violated? Please reference the law that you claim exists.

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 8:37am, #52980

So you're unable to support your own claim?

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 8:07am, #52979

It's obvious that you don't like it when the tables are turned, huh. Anyway, are you outraged that Obama gave congress and Biden a raise, or am I comparing apples and oranges?

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 8:06am, #52978

No, I said that because it is funded by taxpayer dollars at a public institution, it is not allowed to be partisan. You are the one jumping up and down about the 1st Amendment. Stay focused, ok.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 7:40am, #52977

Unfortunately there is much truth in that, even though there shouldn't be. statements and (actual) news should be considered, some does require less consideration than others. Video editing tends to be a bit of a problem in "news" these days though.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 7:37am, #52976

Anything with opinion programming under the guise of news is not a legitimate news source.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 7:35am, #52975

I personally am not a scientist, unless you're a cynic to the degree of saying all information is bs until you individually prove it, I'm sure the evidence provided by the scientific communities should be sufficient for you.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 7:33am, #52974

So your answer is that you would prefer option A - retain the right for known criminals and known violently insane people to anonymously purchase firearms, got it. If you believe laws are useless either you're willfully ignorant or in favor of anarchy.

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 7:32am, #52973

No, you made a claim that some "rule" exists that forbids people from exercising their right to free speech. So support your claim.

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 7:28am, #52972

How about supporting your own claim?

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 7:23am, #52971

I believe whether it does or does would probably come down to the level of detail on the info, as well as whether the psychological issues show the potential or likeliness that the individual will hurt or kill someone, probably more on the latter.

Renza - Apr 24, 2013 7:17am, #52970

There are plenty of christian terrorists and murderers out there, there's no denying it, but comparisons are irrelevant to the point that most groups have extremists in them, and the majority of said groups oppose the extremists within them.

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 6:54am, #52969

I addressed that in my original post, which you ignored also, obviously...

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 6:51am, #52968

It's not a claim, it's a fact. Executive order to give Biden and Congress a raise. Call it a New Years Eve gift. Google it, even the Huffington Post chimed in on the matter.

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 6:50am, #52967

How about these terrorists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism#United_States ..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#United_States

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 6:21am, #52966

Good one :-D

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 6:20am, #52965

Do you consider MSNBC a legitimate news source?

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 6:18am, #52964

Please enlighten us on which "rule" was violated when they exercised their right to free speech?

PapaFox - Apr 24, 2013 6:16am, #52963

Source for that claim?

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 6:12am, #52962

If that was a program funded by taxpayer dollars, it probably violated the rules by being partisan from a public institution, which was alluded to in the article. You decided to ignore that part though.

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 6:09am, #52961

Obama did the same thing when he gave Biden a pay raise at the end of 2012. Are you outraged by that?

Oyster - Apr 24, 2013 6:04am, #52960

They should consideer themselves lucky they only got 5 days!

StoneTools - Apr 24, 2013 2:07am, #52959

I'm not sure that giving police access to psychiatric records will pass the supreme court smell test. doesn't that fall under doctor-patient privilege?

StoneTools - Apr 24, 2013 2:04am, #52958

According to alan dershowitz (sp?) the FBI blew the chance to go for the death penalty by using the public safety escape clause instead of immediately mirandizing him.

OTC - Apr 24, 2013 12:57am, #52957

So you believe he didn't get any money for his 'An Inconvenient Truth'?

OTC - Apr 24, 2013 12:53am, #52956

Now that I've stop laughing, how restrictive are illicit and prescription drugs? Yet, criminals seem to have no problems getting them. More people die from knives than rifles, so why worry only about guns?

NEXT PAGE


Skip to page

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990