Motifake
politics
epic fail
military funny
stupid human
ufo
MAD
politifake

Latest comments




PREV PAGE

Zeitguy - Aug 9, 2014 12:18am, #69921

Faux, missing the point about right to bear arms.

Zeitguy - Aug 9, 2014 12:12am, #69920

Faux, please take small steps away from the edge.

Zeitguy - Aug 9, 2014 12:08am, #69919

Not an accurate me***hor. Albeit an interesting image.

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 11:40pm, #69918

Sonmanto that invented corn that contains its own insecticide- guess what happens with 5-10-15 years of soil bioconcentration as the husks and stalks are plowed back into the soil, regardless of whether that field is crop rotated or not....

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 11:39pm, #69917

and decides the solution needs more copper sulfate. When the bath is done, it gets dumped into the rice paddies out behind the factory... and we wonder why fish has mercury in it, rice is full of arsenic and other metals... not to mention

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 11:36pm, #69916

In this country, someone making a circuit board has to wear all kinds of PPE to test a plating bath, while someone in a third world country wearing shorts and a wife-beater t-shirt in sandals sticks his finger in a plating bath and tastes it

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 11:33pm, #69915

makes sense this no.

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 11:32pm, #69914

or Fauwxlty syllogism. take your pick

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 11:31pm, #69913

Fauxwlty syllogism

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 10:22pm, #69912

Obama Obola, get your Sarah Quotes straight, dammit

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 10:21pm, #69911

furthermore it cracks me up that we ban certain pesticides here in the U.S. so they sell them to third world countries that grow the produce sold in the U.S.!!! Congressional idiots

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 10:18pm, #69910

herp-a-derp never ceases to amaze.....

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 10:16pm, #69909

now you are starting to understand!

JGalt - Aug 8, 2014 10:15pm, #69908

who has been the past 6 years? Harry Reid is the king of obstructionism, Nancy "significant" Pelosi, the Queen....

Zeitguy - Aug 8, 2014 9:55pm, #69907

The only reason we can do it "cleaner" is because we have regulations in place to make sure we don't pollute our backyard. You can't have clean and economically competitive when the rules are different. The dollar wins in the end.

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 9:39pm, #69906

There's too much "not in my back yard" bull **** tied to environmentalism these days and as we lose our industry we lose our control and ability to keep it some what clean.

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 9:38pm, #69905

I agree the war on carbon is a distraction but on both sides. GW alarmests make others feel good with it "look at you, you're saving the planet by shutting down that evil industry in your town, just don't look over in China where it's made now."

Zeitguy - Aug 8, 2014 9:02pm, #69904

But the " war on carbon" is a veil to distract the blame from those that profit from the process.

Zeitguy - Aug 8, 2014 8:50pm, #69903

You're preaching to the choir. The environmental and humanitarian costs that are incurred for the sake of profit is deplorable.

fauxnews - Aug 8, 2014 7:33pm, #69902

ha!

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 7:02pm, #69901

to places where things are going to be worse, and things like mercury lead and asbestose are left to wash out in high tide.

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 7:00pm, #69900

in Bangladesh because they need the scrap for their growing economy. If not for the war on carbon we could keep that industry and run it way cleaner than they will in 3rd world countries. If environmentalism is such a global movement why send industry

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 6:57pm, #69899

That's true, and it's also true that in some cases we just can't compete with slave labor and the ability to just dump toxic waste into the sea. But in the case of the ship breakers the filthy and environmentally hazardous process is only being done...

Zeitguy - Aug 8, 2014 6:21pm, #69898

Would have given you 5Ls but your "cavalier" usage of "quotation marks" keeps me from doing so.

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 5:56pm, #69897

In my state, we have no tax on unprepared food purchases. I think that's the way to go. Also, the Fair Tax Act has a table where the people below poverty level get rebates

Zeitguy - Aug 8, 2014 5:18pm, #69896

Both democrats and republicans are responsible for loss of jobs overseas. But if you want to use it to blame "liberals" then go for it.

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 5:10pm, #69895

The issue with a high sales tax is it kills your economy. People are more inclined to buy there goods else ware, I suppose tariffs and import taxes may help but they also are detrimental to economy. Still not the worst plan so long as no tax on food

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 3:54pm, #69894

made it out of committee.

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 3:53pm, #69893

The only tax that would be fair would be a consumption tax (also known as a fair tax). You buy a yacht, you pay 23% of the cost in tax. You buy a lightbulb, you pay 23% of the cost in tax. The Fair Tax was introduced to congress in 1999, but has never

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 3:42pm, #69892

opf course that f's over a good deal of people termed SUV poor, people who at one time made them selves middle class, but lost their good job due to the poor economy and still have their house and car but are flipping burgers now to feed their family

Curlyrocks - Aug 8, 2014 3:40pm, #69891

The problem is the way they tax int he 1st place, by taking a % of what I earned in the year I am far less inclined to work hard, they should tax people on what they already have, not what they are trying to get.

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 3:32pm, #69890

I'm looking thru the NDAA for 2014. Can you point me to the section/subsection that says that?

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 3:30pm, #69889

So do you think that a Corporate Exec should only be able to keep the same amount as a burger flipper at Micky Dee's?

birddseedd - Aug 8, 2014 3:26pm, #69888

National Defense Authorization Act. authorizes an even one trillion dollars.

birddseedd - Aug 8, 2014 3:26pm, #69887

because 1% of our country controls 90% of the currancy. 35% for me, leaves me with hundreds. where as 35% for a rich man, still leaves him with MILLIONS. I also want to point out, taxing is only half of the problem, government spending is the other half.

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 3:06pm, #69886

If everyone is paying the same percentage, how does that favor the rich?

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 3:04pm, #69885

what law allows that much to be spent on the military?

birddseedd - Aug 8, 2014 2:55pm, #69884

whatever the number is, its way to freakin much. we should not be in the wars we are in, its also not relevant because the law says at any point they can spend up to 1 trillion dollars on the military

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 2:44pm, #69883

1%, all other 4%

EmmaRoydes - Aug 8, 2014 2:43pm, #69882

Defense actually only takes 19% of the budget. Social Security takes 24%, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) takes 22%, safety net programs 12%, interest on debt 6%, Fed retiree benefits 8%, transportation 3%, Education

NEXT PAGE


Skip to page

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990