Motifake
politics
epic fail
military funny
stupid human
ufo
MAD
politifake

Latest comments




PREV PAGE

RonaldReagan - Mar 15, 2015 1:40pm, #73795

For a moment there I thought they were holding hands.

RonaldReagan - Mar 15, 2015 1:39pm, #73794

Of the two officers that brought down the killer, they were interviewed on Oprah.Both spoke of their military service. I don't know of a single vet who doesn't still consider himself a soldier even after his time served.A soldier got him.You are wrong Cal

RonaldReagan - Mar 15, 2015 1:36pm, #73793

Good man. They don't make them like they used to. Are you listening America?

RonaldReagan - Mar 15, 2015 1:36pm, #73792

Gross

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:34pm, #73791

Pardon, from "guarded by well armed soldiers" to later two people with pistils showed up. Only after people who where armed arrived was Hasan stopped. Meaning the exact opposite of your preconceived notion is bared out by the facts.

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:25pm, #73790

And even then, I said up the page that MPs where the only ones allowed to have guns, but you also ignored that to beat your strawman and moved the goal post from surrounded by to that later two people with pistols showed up.

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 1:17pm, #73789

...Nice try, tho, at your "ad hominem" in red-herring sheep's clothing ;-) OK,hope ur day is as beautiful there as it is here.Wasting it on online shenanigans would be the TRUE crime hereX-p Off to enjoy my bike ride.And this day.You do the same.Cheers =)

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:15pm, #73788

http://www.stripes.com/news/civilian-police-officer-acted-quickly-to-help-subdue-alleged-gunman-1.96218

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:14pm, #73787

Actually he was a civilian police officer. You false a**umed that because he was a sergeant that he was military. This also required you to once again ignore that facts given to reach your falsehood,

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 1:11pm, #73786

Oh, rubbish. SERGEANT Mark Todd sh** Hasan.Yes, SERGEANT Mark was also MP. But to suggest he wasn't a soldier;or that he wouldn't consider himself a soldier first, a police officer second, like most soldiers would is simply a "falsehood" on your part ;-)

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:08pm, #73785

The irony is that you yourself are using the argument from ignorance to say God doesn't exist andy our own argument even points out your own error. And don;t forget that strawman you're beating as it wasn't stated that God exists.

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:01pm, #73784

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Fort_Hood_shooting#Soldier_Readiness_Processing_Center_shootings

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:00pm, #73783

Actually he was sh** by a police officer with a pistol. So your "proof" is yet another falsehood. Not only that you are ignoring the already presented facts to justify your falsehood and covering with insults and ridicule.

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:49pm, #73782

But it will have to wait: I'm off for my weekly day-long bike ride home. Remember? My mountain bike I ride that I accidently called my mountain "mike." Now THAT you can make fun of me for. ;-) Embarrassing fo sho. X-D Have a good day, mate. Cheers =)

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:47pm, #73781

...that's a MUCH better example of what I think you are going for here. ;-) lol.. But I've officially disagreed about this. So, sure, what to debate it? I'll bite. Look at #73776,#73777,#73778 & #73779 for my position on this now...

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:45pm, #73780

...Sooooo...no one "put me in my place" over this, OTC. X-p This isn't like the time when you were "put in your place" for pretending to be a women hoping to get a leg up in argument - only for ya to still backpedal about it...

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:38pm, #73779

...in fact,you ironically make my point for me - that if even a well-armed military base can be surprised attack by these random shootings then maybe the NRA's contention "More Guns is a the solution" is actually a crock of ****.That attitude's the prob

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:36pm, #73778

Suggesting that a military base - which is a**igned with the task of preparing men for combat - would be on alert most of the time in wartime following 9/11 is not the smoking gun you think it is.lol...

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:32pm, #73777

...At least for my position I can provide actual proof you are wrong: the shooter Hasan was taken out in this case was by guess who? a soldier carrying a gun. He was sh** - which kinda disproves the contention that there were no soldiers carrying guns.

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:29pm, #73776

...And, I still disagree with the nonsense that "soldiers don't have weapons on military bases" - the debate about it a year ago didn't settle anything other than people strongly disagree on this strange point here one way or another...

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:26pm, #73775

...In other words, no one "put me in my place" about this - which your "friend" has implied. Clearly you are jumping on this for passive-aggressive reasons. I get it - my poster offends you.At least man up and say so rather than go down this childish path

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:23pm, #73774

*yawn* I'm not objecting to the fact I've participated in this debate, before. LIke I said, I admit I occasionally have. As recently as a year ago. I'm objecting to the idea of being "told",as if I was being scolded by people in a position of authority...

OTC - Mar 15, 2015 11:54am, #73773

Poster #27822 faux's comment #44903 followed by comment #44908, yes, faux has been told that soldiers don't carry weapons because they are kept locked up

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 10:01am, #73772

...when believing in God makes about as much sense as believing in the Easter bunny. Tell you what, Ipa, the better question is: Can you prove through scientific a***ysis and fact that God exists? When you do, I'm sure a Nobel prize awaits you. ;-) Cheers

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 9:56am, #73771

...The burden, mate, is on you (not them) to provide evidence for God's existence and so far there has been insufficient evidence. The word "hoax" is used when people still make $$$ off of other's stubbornness to believe in it anyways...

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 9:49am, #73770

...This represents a type of false dich**omy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false....

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 9:49am, #73769

...the fallacy here is an "appeal to ignorance" (in which ignorance stands for "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It a**erts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa)...

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 9:48am, #73768

*yawn* Science is pretty sure Santa doesn't exist either. Also a hoax - albeit a very cute and harmless one. However, they are not required to 'disprove it' anymore than they have to disprove there is a man living in the center of the moon....

ipaprime - Mar 15, 2015 9:11am, #73767

Can you prove through scientific a***ysis and fact that God is a hoax?

ipaprime - Mar 15, 2015 9:07am, #73766

I remembber that discussion quite well LyingInformer

ipaprime - Mar 15, 2015 9:05am, #73765

Common sense. I see none here.

ipaprime - Mar 15, 2015 9:04am, #73764

Don't forget bows, crossbows. baseball bats, axes, machetes, crowbars, and plenty of other LEAGLE items.

DebtToAmerica - Mar 15, 2015 8:49am, #73763

arguably the biggest argument in favour of gun rights is "scientists and black people need guns to defend themselves from the genocidal fantasies of right-wing fanatical conspiracy theorists"... if we ban guns they'll resort to explosives.

DebtToAmerica - Mar 15, 2015 8:43am, #73762

they literally believe that 97% of scientists are part of a conspiracy to mislead the public, just like how adolf hilter believed that a "jewish conspiracy" was controlling the world.

DebtToAmerica - Mar 15, 2015 8:34am, #73761

they dont think guns will make people safer, they just want to continue stashing weapons for when they try to a**assinate obama and exterminate all the liberals and scientists.

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:05am, #73760

They're not. Instead a false dilemma was used to make it appear so. In other news Reps wrote a letter...

calron - Mar 15, 2015 1:03am, #73759

Your hyper focus on that one term will not make the facts that I posted go away, nor will your ridicule make your falsehoods right.

Bandit5906 - Mar 15, 2015 12:53am, #73758

I thought they were not siding with ovomit?

fauxnews - Mar 15, 2015 12:52am, #73757

Using the word"ad hominem" every time you paint yourself into a corner doesnt get you off the hook. I get what you're saying - you're just wrong. OK,get yourself a goldfish.The attention's flattering but Im already taken ;-) Have a good night,bro. Cheers!

calron - Mar 15, 2015 12:43am, #73756

Citation of above: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/04/02/here-are-the-rules-on-carrying-firearms-on-fort-hood/

NEXT PAGE


Skip to page

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990