Motifake
politics
epic fail
military funny
stupid human
ufo
MAD
politifake

Latest comments




PREV PAGE

Oldsod - Apr 19, 2015 6:04am, #75416

(with Liverpudlian accent) If you look at it long enough...it looks a little like McCartney...

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 3:04am, #75415

:p

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 3:00am, #75414

To borrow a line from Skylar in Breaking Bad, Who protects us from those protecting us? 1L. Negative 5Ls, if possible.

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 2:58am, #75413

Lame exploitative ugly propaganda with a streak of unintended ironic truth - Nidal Hasan, "Tim" McVeigh, Eddie Ray Routh. All US veterans who terrorized innocents. Going to war as a manly rite of passage = recipe 4 psychopathic maschismo temper tantrums

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 2:45am, #75412

Threw up in my mouth a little. This is a little funny - just a little. :)

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 2:43am, #75411

You actually do deny science OTC. Taking a wild stab at this - but I imagine faux recognizes that the scientific community doesn't think your denial makes you a bad person, nor should they. They don't have to. They just don't give a **** what you think :)

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 2:43am, #75410

You know, becca, I've sh** people for less X-D (it's the withdrawal talking, I promise).

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 2:31am, #75409

Boy this is dumb OTC, even for you - a rational person can deny the literalness and superstition some zealots invest in religion while acknowledging the existence of religious ideology, and even respecting it to some degree.

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 2:24am, #75408

I stand corrected. One comment from moi, and a wall of fauxmemes later. hee hee I spoke too soon :) As much as I loathe your lame sense of humor, faux, I'll take your nuttiness any day over foxrecon's ugly politico-torture snuff p***. Good show doll

rebeccaolsen - Apr 19, 2015 2:20am, #75407

Who need cigarettes, faux, when you can bite into an healthy organic carrot or pop into your trap a stick of refreshing gum? Instead of smoke breaks, a nice fresh air break. Yes - I'm being ornery and annoying on purpose. :)

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 2:15am, #75406

BTW faux, you deny God exists, does that mean you deny religion exists as well?

calron - Apr 19, 2015 2:04am, #75405

Here'e a handy link as if goes to the studies in question where you can read the them in total, http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/12/all-97-consensus-studies-refuted-by.html

calron - Apr 19, 2015 2:03am, #75404

Cook had a nice breakdown with the study. However double checking by other did not come up with the same results. Some of the others have been accused of padding, but Zimmerman was a poll.

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:51am, #75403

Still, someone had to come up with that number and no one can tell me who or how. Did they just use papers that leaned toward MMCC, or did they use all the research papers?

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:45am, #75402

Depends on how you ask too, as in the Zimmerman survey. Many scientists had a problem answering the question and supposedly some refused to answer because of how it was written

calron - Apr 19, 2015 1:43am, #75401

And OTC might be arguing the more than 1/2 and dangerous standard, which would be even lower. That's why defining exactly what is meant in an argument is important.

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:42am, #75400

and the climate seems to be getting cooler (at least here in the south where the last 2 Springs have been unseasonally cool)

calron - Apr 19, 2015 1:39am, #75399

The consensus among climatologists is actually around 90% if you ask if a significant amount of warming is AGW. If you ask if more than 1/2 is then that number drops even lower.

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:39am, #75398

Again, I don't deny science, or that we shouldn't be good stewards of earth and pollute, and I don't deny we are contributing to CO2, but when people are profiting from MMCC fear, then I have to question it, especially when the ice caps didn't melt

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:31am, #75397

when their has been a huge 'green' movement against pollution,oil, and energy using current global heating as a tool to further an agenda? Just as in the Bee-Gate, where scientists drew a conclusion before the research simply to ban a pesticide

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:26am, #75396

I'm mention 97% because that's what it's know as,it could be 80 to 100% for that matter as that's still a majority, but therre are reports of the consensus being doctored, so how do we know papers not favoring MMCC were omitted to make a bigger percentage

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:26am, #75395

Have a good one, OTC. Cheers =)

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:25am, #75394

Accept my apology if I over did it. Truly, it was nothing personal. I just got carried away is all. Still loves ya, mate. ;-) We are just doing our Siskel and Ebert thing. I enjoy it too. Just take me with a grain of salt. You enjoy the weekend as well

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:23am, #75393

haha...You didn't push my b.uttons mate ;-) Im always this cantankerous when I quit smoking.Sorry if I came off as harsh.I admit I was being too opinionated.I truly didn't mean it.Just got caught up in the spirit of things and was being overly competitive

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:20am, #75392

correction(#75389): "No one in their right mind would suggest that MOST (if not NEARLY ALL) climatologists do 'NOT' find MMCC to be unequivocal."

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:19am, #75391

I usually enjoy sparring with you, but you went off the deep end, sorry, didn't mean to push your bu.tton, have a good weekend mate

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:18am, #75390

They are only guilty of being a little rough around the edges and over simplifying things a bit for an ignorant public. But whether THE TRUTH is the consensus is 95.2% or 99.3%, they are still in the right ballpark. You're splitting hairs, mate.(2/2)

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:16am, #75389

In other words, OTC, you can't see the forest for the trees. No one in their right mind would suggest that MOST (if not NEARLY ALL) climatologists find MMCC to be unequivocal. Four peer-reviewed meta studies on the consensus uphold this (1/2)

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:14am, #75388

It's not my own science, its science other than MMCC, such as cosmoclimatology, pacific decadal oscillation, earth's orbit etc. but because those don't fit the MMCC narrative its just junk political science

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:13am, #75387

(on OTC#75383) You are misrepresenting facts completely.Virtually every peer-reviewed study and reputable climatologist finds that MMCC is unequivocal when they examine the findings.They invite your skepticism.But reject your baseless denial.

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:11am, #75386

Denying we are a major factor in the game is not the same as denying science. you believe we are, I believe its nature and that this would be happening (as it has done in the history of earth) even if we weren't burning fossil fuels.

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:06am, #75385

...but, aside from junk science (which is NOT really science) you can't have your OWN 'science' (not in the objective logical sense, at least - as in, you can have your OWN set of opinions, but not your OWN set of facts). Cheers

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:04am, #75384

According to the Christian theology, I probably AM blasphemous and I'm probably going to their hell in their worldview. I can live with their opinion of me. Why? Because I can care less what they think of me. You can have your own religion...

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 1:04am, #75383

And l report that said as little as 79 papers were used to draw a consensus. Kinda like "4 out of 5 dentists agree.." Where dies that come from? Someone has to make that determination, can they be trusted? Who decided on the 97%, Cook, Zimmerman, Doran?

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 1:02am, #75382

Well science says MMCC is unequivocal and you are denying it. I'm just telling you what the science SAYS. No one is saying you have to AGREE with the science; you have the freedom to DENY it all you want. I deny God exists.Feel free to call me blasphemous

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 12:56am, #75381

Consensus was determined, it makes me wonder if some papers were disregarded for not favoring MMCC which would give a different outcome as I've read there were only 200 papers out of 1000's that were used to derive the 97%

OTC - Apr 19, 2015 12:51am, #75380

I love how I'm labeled a 'science denier' because I don't believe MMCO2. is causing global warming but contributing to it along with other factors that may have a greater percentage of an effect than what we are doing. since I couldn't find how the

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 12:02am, #75379

But yeah, I whole-heartedly agree that both sides engage in a denialism that is equally stupid. We are all guilty of letting our politics get in the way. It's the people that can't admit it that are THE REAL troublemakers. My 2 cents,Calron.Cheers,mate =)

fauxnews - Apr 19, 2015 12:00am, #75378

...I dont think there is a problem even as severe as MMCC that we humans cant evolve past.But that require BOTH SIDES to let go of their dogma.They need to acknowledge science(ie.deniers)and how their personal politics ONLY makes things worse(ie.the left)

fauxnews - Apr 18, 2015 11:59pm, #75377

...I dont think there is a problem even as severe as MMCC that we humans cant evolve past.But that require BOTH SIDES to let go of their dogma.They need to acknowledge science(ie.deniers)and how their personal politics ONLY makes things worse(ie.the left)

NEXT PAGE


Skip to page

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 1090 1100 1110 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990