Protection against tyranny - politics Whatever everyone may want to believe, quickly passing restrictive feel-good laws and suppressing freedom will not save lives. Weapon bans will only continue to make people vulnerable. There will always be tragedies that cannot be averted. Why open the door wide for those who will not comply with an arms ban? The mentally ill and criminals will prey upon an innocent disarmed public. Why set the stage for future tragic scenarios? Can we all recall the historic failure of the very noble cause of banning alcohol? I find this rush to react extremely frightening, along with the cavalier attitude with which people are so willing to ignore the Second Amendment to show they are addressing a problem. The Second Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights for a reason. It has nothing to do with hunting or target shooting; it has everything to do with tyranny. The true cowards are those who vote for "feel good" legislation knowing it will do no good whatsoever against crime, yet give unscrupulous, power hungry politicians ever more absolute control over us. It should be obvious to everyone that gun control is not about guns or crime, but about control. The only reason America is not a socialist dictatorship right now is an armed populace.
| |
we the sheeple - politics
| |
THIS GOVERNMENT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL - politics WHY IS THE MASS MEDIA MAKING A BIG DEAL ABOUT THE SUPPOSED BOSTON BOMBERS "POSSIBLE" CONNECTION TO AL QAEDA BUT SAYING NOTHING ABOUT OUR GOVERNMENT SUPPORTING THE SYRIAN REBEL GROUP "AL NUSRA" WITH MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN AID WHICH HAS OPENLY PLEDGED THEIR ALLEGIANCE TO AL QAEDA?
| |
ayers - politics
| |
antigun - politics
| |
|
Show us some love 
Flaunt your poster |
