Over 59654

Deniers Politics

Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -

Arguing with climate change skeptics -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 10:10 am
What are you going to believe computer models that have failed to predict reality or or your own senses.
fauxnews - February 7, 2015, 5:05 pm
You know....you're a real pain in the a**. :)
Curlyrocks - February 6, 2015, 8:15 pm
The sun in their diagram is in fact much smaller than the sun in reality, and appears to be giving off much less solar radiation than it actually does.

Liberal Science Deniers -

Liberal Science Deniers -

You can have your own set of opinions... -


TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3.53/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:49 pm
What's the Washington post have to do with anything? Im just teasing you for replying to yourself in a post like Norman Bates. You even quoted yourself, schizoboy. http://www.politifake.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9611&start=80#p138776
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:46 pm
the washington post? What's the problem with that? Oh, they don't do the chicken little thing. Now I understand. You would much rather use the Comedy channel, right?
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:44 pm
I think you should change your avatar to the sky falling and your name here to chicken little. It would be much more apropo
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:42 pm
Like talking to yourself, conspiracy boy? Oh, that's right, you do. http://www.politifake.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9611&start=80#p138776 I will consider the source on this one. Your tinfoil hat is cutting off O2 from your brain again. x-D FTW
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:19 pm
You read and quote from the comedy channel ... so you tell me manmade climate conspiracy boy.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:06 pm
You read and quote from the UK Daily Mail...so you tell me, conspiracy boy. Normally, this is where I'd say, you need to calm down and smoke one out but then again you probably read from there that pot will melt your brain. So never mind. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:58 pm
So, tell me, faux, did your education in britain entail nothing other than conspiracy sites and reading National Enquirer for your study materials?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 2:55 pm
*yawn* If you did have classes in science, then either you failed out or you are living proof that the American education system has failed. Nah, keep those tissues. Sounds like you still need it. I'd cry too if I had your report card. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:49 pm
At least I had classes in science. You just spout what your favorite conspiracy magazine headlines. Reality is just a word to you, not an actual occurrence. Did you already go thru all of those tissues that were donated to you?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 2:18 pm
Nah, because you don't believe in FACTS. You define facts as anything you choose to believe in. FACT: 97-99% according to verified public record. We already know you get an F in science. Now you can make a complete set with your F+ in reality. X-D FTW
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:01 pm
97-99% in your mind, maybe. Nutty scientists are the ones that you are on board with. FACTS just destroy your manmade bs.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 1:03 pm
*slapping knee* I know,right? It's only a 97-99% consensus. Check this out...they also think the world's round. Yeah,right! That means people in China would be standing upside down.Nutty scientists and their liberal FACTS.God made the world flat. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 1:02 am
Unanimous? bwahahahahaha

If you think snow disproves man-made global warming, well, at least you have Obamacare now to help you with your mental illness! -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3.85/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Curlyrocks - March 16, 2014, 1:25 am
So I'v been playing the new South Park game, I made the mistake of playing the Al Gore missions 1st because he's hilarious, big mistake now I get a message from the needy clown every 3 minutes of game time.
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:25 pm
You have a good day as well, sir. :-)
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:24 pm
...because the Church,for instance,turned God into a form of idolatry by trying to make God a physical fact of the world.Science = facing facts. What you do w/them is up to you. If I'm snide it's because some want science to be something other than it is
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 6:23 pm
*get done. *scientists God, I can't type today. Have a good one, faux.
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 6:22 pm
Not to be rude, but as I said, I didn't want to debate. I wanted to post a poster, then get back to multitude of other things I must get. I stand by my scientist, you stand by yours. It's moot because we'll all be in FEMA camps before it's done. *winks
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:21 pm
...so, that makes me an atheist by most definitions. But ironically most humane science types who don't believe in god are, ironically, more in line with what spirituality expects of them than what religions requires today...
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:19 pm
Of course I can. Personally I think God is a spiritual concern and we should be thankfully we can't find proof of God's existence. It doesn't belong to the physical realm. But most theories about God don't stand because, factually, there is no proof...
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:17 pm
So the debate isn't whether GW is real and caused by man AND threatening the planet. The REAL debate is:presented w/ this reality are you going to accept it or not. There are pros & cons to avoiding reality. Hopefully you're prepared for the consequences
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 6:17 pm
faux, I didn't post the first one to start a debate. I posted because you made a snide remark about those who disagree with man-made Climate Change. You can no more say the above than say there is NO GOD, or there is A GOD. That's all I was doing.
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:14 pm
The problem is you say scientists are forming their theories "for the $$$". Yet the same science they use to come up with their GW theories has been used to test their theories by others. And it's shown, independently, that man made climate change is real
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:10 pm
I like to think of this debate like the movie "Dumb & Dumber." Some h** babe tells Floyd he has NO chance with her. He says,"Not even a small one?"And she says,"It's an one in a million." To which he happily says, "So there is STILL a chance!" Dumb indeed
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:08 pm
If you drink liquid drano, sure...there is probably a 3% chance you won't get sick. So should say, to hell with the doctors, pour me a sh**??? Of course you wouldn't. But because this issue can involve politics and beliefs, it's easier to be irrational
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:06 pm
For instance, two staticians, using science, predicted the 2012 election months before and came within a single electoral vote using behavioral stats. And the conservatives mad fun of them...until election night. Those type of outcomes can't be dismissed.
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:05 pm
It's all probability based. So just because there is no "for sure" theory doesn't devalue the power of science. Yes, some people told they will die by doctors, a 99% chance, do in fact survive. But those are the exceptions, not the rule.
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 6:04 pm
It's like this. Science, like mathematics, is an empirical system, not a philosophy. But, yes, you can be philosophical about it. Pretends it's facts aren't real, etc. But to mock science with statements that are, ironically,logic based is to back science
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 4:58 pm
Scientists want their grants so they will, and have, stuck with the hand that feeds them. I’m a*** when it comes to science. Those percentages? They were invented within the IPCC. They were not bases on statistical data or math calculations.
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 4:54 pm
Supposed to read,"The problem is NOT CO2." Sorry.
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 4:52 pm
Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace in 71, quit them in 86 when they made a sharp turn to the political left. The whole green movement is political. Remember Sagan harping on an ice age? Now global warming. Oops, I mean Climate Change.
premiumgrade - March 4, 2014, 4:52 pm
The facts are clear. There is no empirical proof that man is responsible for climate change. 95% of scientists believe it? 2% believe it? Either way there is still NO proof. “Consensus” isn’t a scientific term. It’s a judgment. That’s not science.
fauxnews - March 4, 2014, 2:10 am
Um.....not sure what you are saying. The poster pokes fun at people who are in denial over the science about climate change. The consensus of scientists globally and independent of each other believe man is ruining our environment. That's my point.
premiumgrade - March 3, 2014, 2:20 am
The problem is CO2. It's not causing Global Warming.


POP QUIZ, KIDS: What do these two contentious political issues have in common? -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3.78/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - January 18, 2014, 12:34 pm
What? You didn't complain about it last night when I did that you Arnnatz. X-D
OTC - January 18, 2014, 8:32 am
"Teabag Party"? Faux, leave your personal social life out of this
fauxnews - January 18, 2014, 4:46 am
Sure........this really is a sickness/addiction for you, isn't it? *snicker* Never fail to amuse me.
Ron2 - January 18, 2014, 3:53 am
they have in common the fact if you tell a lie enough times it becomes believed. They have in common both agendas were and are a bag of lies and misinformation and poorly presented data leaving out... important facts. That is what they have in common.


TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3/5


Anti-science hate mongers are slow thinkers -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

terroraustralis - September 13, 2014, 7:26 am
i mean, you ARE doing it, clearly, and i just accused you, so SURELY you can see how that might be infuriating and offensive? right?
terroraustralis - September 13, 2014, 7:24 am
i think there are alot of things he hasnt encountered before... like books... or the laws that prevent military personel from making political statements... he's lucky none of us are petty enough to report him for it...
terroraustralis - September 13, 2014, 7:20 am
hey man, dont be calling people liberals, or leftists. that **** is offensive. how would you like it if i accused you of b****ing about climate change in order to suppress criticism of obama?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 13, 2014, 6:48 am
*h** = h ot
CthulthuDownUnder - September 13, 2014, 6:37 am
aye, in all your travels you've never encountered a Queenlander before. I can forgive that. Some advice: Use milk in your h** chocolate, not vodka. That offense, "soldier", I can not forgive. Don't drink and type
foxrecon19d - September 13, 2014, 6:31 am
"Aye?" So you're a pirate now? Cnthulthu the Scottish Pirate? Why is it that the most devout and loyal of Barack Obama's left-wing lunatic Americans always claim to be conservatives from another country?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 13, 2014, 3:05 am
Pity me.Aye,no one cared.Well,expect that ONE American who took the time to whine,I meant, "write" your comment.Nothing says,"HURR DURR, I DONT CARE" more, than you having to go out of your way to tell me "you don't care."An awful amount of time,in fact
foxrecon19d - September 13, 2014, 12:57 am
Cnthulthu, you spend an awful lot of time whining about how your feelings get hurt when no one cares about your played out leftist propaganda or your little Crayola posters that no one can see. Wait, let me put that in words you can understand: hurt durr
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:14 pm
you dont understand why it would be a good thing if everyone was scientifically literate, just like how liberals dont understand that everyone being armed would be a good thing. STOP ALLOWING YOURSELF TO BE BLINDED BY FALSE NOTIONS OF LEFT v RIGHT.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:12 pm
seriously, i'm not making that comparison just for laughs, YOU OPPOSE SCIENCE FOR THE SAME REASONS LIBERALS OPPOSE THE 2ND AMMENDMENT.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:07 pm
funny how you automatically a**ume anyone who supports science is a leftist... what do you have to say about anti-vaxxers? last i checked, science has no political affiliation, science is a tool, like a gun, and you're attacking it just like a LEFTIST.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 2:37 pm
Use sugar in your kool-aid, not cocaine.
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2014, 2:32 pm
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Now why would I need to insult you when you are doing a pretty good job of insulting yourself? You admit that I use a com-pu-ter pro-gram while you also admit that you need to use cra-yons HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 2:28 pm
this from a RINO who uses MS-paint to make his. why don't I feel insulted? lame.
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2014, 2:21 pm
Nah...looks like you need your little crayons to make your little posters
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 1:20 pm
Aye,coloring books.Since you clearly are illiterate and can not read (i.e. your drunken nonsense that conservatives who disagree with you MUST be liberals), you rely on what you CAN understand.Or do we need to break out the crayons and draw you a picture?
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2014, 1:10 pm
Hey look! Just Like I said. Boy, you can read these leftist wingnuts like a book... a coloring book!

Liberal Science Deniers -

Global Warming Alarmists' New Claim: Satellites Are Lying -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 12, 2016, 2:12 am
There is also the U.S. Climate Reference Network USCRN witch [sic] is supposed to be so accurate that its numbers never need adjusting. It shows a declaine in US temp where the adjusted number show an increase.

Islam vs Islamist -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - December 21, 2015, 5:45 pm
Dang, I need to proof read better. That first "to" should be "is".

dems on Islamism -

Liberal Science Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Dwydwyyr - August 9, 2015, 7:56 pm
What's this rubbish? Yes, germs are considered living organisms. Never heard of a single Christian Fundy demand we pass laws banning Listerine. As far as "human organisms" go, there was bombing Iraq,the death penalty,etc.Fundies are Pro-birth,not Pro-life
OTC - August 9, 2015, 7:30 pm
Not a clump of cells, parts for profit.

The Drunk, Brain-Dead Human Gaffe Machine -

world hunger -

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by skeezixmcgurk

ScatXXVII - February 21, 2017, 5:45 pm
Just kidding. Nice poster. Upvoted
ScatXXVII - February 21, 2017, 5:44 pm
Actually, people point to Global Warming as proof that Snowflakes exist (left wing liberal Snowflakes, that is) LOL!

The Idiocy of MSNBC's "Science" Reporting On Full Display -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Libertas - November 9, 2015, 10:39 pm
pretty much proves that liberals and science are incompatible.

Liberal Science Deniers -

Liberal Logic -

Snowmageddon 2016 -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - January 24, 2016, 2:07 pm
New York should have obviously passed a law outlawing snowzilla from entering the state. :D

Green Fascism & Eco-Tyranny -

Liberal Science Deniers -

Liberal Science Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - June 22, 2015, 12:15 am
Also that 97% number come Cook's a***yzes of studies, rather than a poll of scientists. The actual polls like doran & zimmerman have it just below 90%. They also claim pointing this out is nitpucking, but if it is so inconsequential, then why use the 97?

Liberal Science Deniers -

Alert: Nations Now Capable Of Using Online Photo Meme Makers To Launch Missiles anywhere -

TAGS: www www www www www www
Rating: 4.48/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - May 30, 2015, 2:49 pm
BUMP http://i.imgur.com/IIqQu.gif

The Complete Insanity of the Climate Change Debate -

Deniers of natural climate change phenomenon -

Blue Harvest -

Republican Science Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.11/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - June 7, 2015, 3:34 pm
Looks like I pushed your b***ons very well. ;)
fauxnews - May 26, 2015, 3:10 pm
lol..Exactly. ;-) 5L your comment if I could. Cheers
Bandit5906 - May 26, 2015, 3:04 pm
Spell check?

You can ignore the man behind the curtain -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.1/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

rebeccaolsen - June 15, 2015, 9:47 pm
Zeitguy - June 15, 2015, 8:31 pm
Those noses will live in my nightmares tonight:)

Man made global warming -

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.06/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

Zeitguy - June 2, 2015, 7:39 pm
Rebecca our sweet sarcastic dialogue is always appreciated and undeniably recognized.
rebeccaolsen - June 2, 2015, 12:36 am
I was being sarcastic http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/1349431952_einstein-duh.jpg
Zeitguy - June 1, 2015, 11:04 pm
And Curly please disregard your favorite sites for "scientific facts of god fearing republicans" and check out other non biased sources. Preferably those that don't aspire to the creationist theory.
Zeitguy - June 1, 2015, 10:58 pm
Yes Rebecca that last "t" is silent. But only his good friends know this, so phonetically it is quite similar.
fauxnews - June 1, 2015, 10:56 pm
That was the political fear mongering by liberal alarmists. The accepted science on MMCC was more thoughtful than that. It is confusing a political debate with a scientific debate that makes that mistake. Al Gore and other politicians ain't scientists
Curlyrocks - June 1, 2015, 10:52 pm
Wasn't the theory back then that we'de all be dead by now? Melted ice caps, 2ft of water in Manhattan, equator regions to h** for life?
rebeccaolsen - June 1, 2015, 10:26 pm
How do you call someone named Matt just 'Mat.'? Do you try to say the name really fast or do you just cut yourself off at Ma- and then just barely whisper out the T sound? =p
Zeitguy - June 1, 2015, 10:22 pm
His friends call him Mat.
rebeccaolsen - June 1, 2015, 10:12 pm

Fairy tales -

TAGS: www www www www www www
Rating: 4.03/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - May 25, 2015, 10:11 pm
Except I didn't defend Soon, I pointed out how someone got what he said wrong. Soon believe that variation in that cycle cause warming, but that is not what he was attacked for.
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:41 pm
And Wei Hack Soon was using 'that' to (falsely) indict the MMCC consensus in the most ignorant of manners. Not that it matters, mate. Following the exposure of his corruption, only a pure ignoramus would defend Wei Soon at this point. You were saying? :-)
calron - May 25, 2015, 9:20 pm
Yeh, you'd think you'd at least get his hypothesis right when you attack it. The output of the sun does change over time and that does affect the earth's climate on a 11 year cycle.
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 11:57 am
Pretty much,denier.Either,ignorantly or purposely ignoring the irony of his derp, he is basically saying that all that man-made climate change stuff is just the normal seasons "going through the motions" - kinda like the way you are doing right now hun :)
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:57 pm
So he believes in summer and winter?
rebeccaolsen - May 13, 2015, 2:44 am

Conservatard Reality Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.02/5

More politifakes by Dwydwyyr

OTC - August 11, 2015, 4:51 pm
Like his logic that "birth"days shouldn't be on the day of "birth"
MMessEnnBeeCee - August 10, 2015, 8:06 am
Funny how you use the word logic like you know what it means or that you have a grasp on how to use it. Plus, you never make anything but derogatory comments on any posters. You are the King of Hypocrisy.

History -

Magic Beans -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3.97/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

rebeccaolsen - June 19, 2015, 9:15 pm
Just caught that. Tree p'orn? :D
Zeitguy - June 19, 2015, 8:43 pm
Groot likes!

God has a message for Republicans on Climate Change... -

Climate Change Denier Logic -

After 400 years -

TAGS: www www
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

DebtToAmerica - March 11, 2015, 2:27 pm
its a shame the rest of humanity still judges ideas based on who told them of the idea, rather than on the merit of the ideas and their supporting evidence. "liberals talking about climate change? it must be a conspiracy!"
DebtToAmerica - March 11, 2015, 2:25 pm
issac newton is proof that even the most bat**** wierdo nutjob will be listened to if his theory makes sense and has evidence.
DebtToAmerica - March 11, 2015, 2:17 pm
invents calculus and laws of motion, and is listened to by scientists... despite spending 2/3 of his career trying to predict the date of the apocalypse by studying the bible.

" I d i o c r a c y " i s s u p p o s e d t o b e a m o v i e . -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3.35/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - February 8, 2015, 8:37 pm
A hilarious movie that unfortunately has become all to prophetic.

Logic and Reason According to Climate Change Deniers -

How Republicans View the World -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 3.17/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 9, 2015, 3:33 pm
Gee…The Telegraph, a conservative, tabloid newspaper thinks the 97% consensus of climatologists is a massive liberal hoax/conspiracy. Color me surprised.
Bandit5906 - February 9, 2015, 1:13 pm
The Telegraph: The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever.
fauxnews - February 8, 2015, 5:22 pm
*bows* Well...thank you. :-) P.S. Welcome to Politifake!
DebtToAmerica - February 8, 2015, 5:13 pm
haha, this made me think of "i have a job, so clearly anyone who doesnt must be lazy, end welfare!".

Great News for Xtian Fundy Climate Change Deniers! -

The Current debate -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

rebeccaolsen - May 15, 2015, 12:25 pm
Never heard of "Orielly."(#76184) Who is he? obvious spam from a professional denier fail troll is obvious #76177, #76178, #76179, #76180, #76181, #76182, #76183, #76184
freasy - May 15, 2015, 10:49 am
OH so Liberals don't like their tactics used on them? Really don't like Orielly anyway.

Cognitive Dissonance -

Our poor ears! -

Republican Science Deniers -

Believes in Global Warming -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.62/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - March 10, 2015, 9:53 pm
As an American I endorse this poster.

Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by Zeitguy

Zeitguy - March 5, 2015, 9:30 pm
Science says H2o is needed for the existence of life, but I say it is a deadly killer for those that can't swim.
OTC - March 4, 2015, 5:07 pm
Science says aluminium is a neurotoxin, which is in vaccines but hey, maybe you like getting injected with neurotoxins, that would explain some things.

When a Republican science denier starts making excuses -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.56/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:18 pm
Translation (Calvon): Try to use more fancy words to cover my a$s.
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:15 pm
So did you not get the joke and cry or get it and cry as a "parody"?
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:32 pm
Translation (Calvon): Waaah.
calron - May 25, 2015, 8:40 pm
Yep, you don;t the truth, you can't Handel the truth. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/George_Frideric_Handel_by_Balthasar_Denner.jpg :P

Approximately 97% of climate scientists found man-made climate change is real. Republicans deny this. -

Science Says Man-Made Climate Change is Real. Republicans deny it. -

CO2 Good for plants. -

When a Republican science denier starts making excuses -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.41/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:33 pm
Okay, tell yourself that if it makes you feel better, mate. :-) *eating popcorn, enjoying the show*
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:28 pm
I don't know why you'r b***on are pushed, I just know you take the time to pretend to know what I think and get it wrong. Maybe I could go point out some of my spelling errors that no one mentioned, cause I've made many.
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 10:23 pm
Mate...why would your bad spelling and your insecurity over it (with your pathological excuses) push MY b'uttons? ;-) haha You hand yourself over to us on a silver platter; ie.you are the gift that keeps on giving. But. please, continue with your show.
calron - May 25, 2015, 10:18 pm
Wow, didn't you just tantrum over a response of mine like this and call it lame? Looks like that Tomato In The Mirror is your fiercest opponent. :)
fauxnews - May 25, 2015, 9:27 pm
Glad to see you admit it. The first step is always the hardest X-D
calron - May 25, 2015, 8:38 pm
Looks like a b***on has been pushed. :P

Cats and dogs -

denying climate change -

Man-made Climate Change is a hoax according to some Republicans -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

hulksmash - February 23, 2015, 10:06 am
welcome back, Terroraustralis. You have the stones to tell everyone else? or you going to wallow in shame?
DebtToAmerica - February 21, 2015, 10:45 am
what if climate change deniers cause hurricanes? I.E. god sends extreme weather as a way of saying "stop poluting my planet, you ungrateful ****s"

if we're going to measure atmospheric CO2 -

Believes in Noah's Ark -

Deniers, not scientists, understand climate. -

Global Warming is a farce -

Duh-Nye the Climate Change vs. Bill Nye the science guy -

global warming Deniers sound like they come from Mars -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 6:13 pm
Translation(OTC): http://s7.postimg.org/kp962pqvv/i6559.jpg
OTC - February 26, 2015, 5:57 pm
"Someone dares to have a difference of opinion, so I better attack and ridicule him because that's what the liberal gubmint school taught me about debating!"-Faux
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 5:48 pm
Translation(OTC): Ancient Aliens! http://1mut.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ancient-aliens-guy-meme-collection-1mut.com-6.jpg
OTC - February 26, 2015, 5:33 pm
Faux has demonstrated a lack of comprehension, understanding context, and a***ogy examples. He must be drunk on MMGW kool-aid again
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 3:17 pm
haha... Touche ;-)
Curlyrocks - February 26, 2015, 3:12 pm
Why? Mars is also warming last time I checked.

Explaining Science to a Republican -

Climate Change Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 14, 2015, 5:15 pm
Its not my fault you do the facts on what I've said wrong. I've never made a argument against MMGW on this site, but sh** down bad arguments on both sides. The fact that you have responded to me shooting down bad antiMMGW arguments shows your biases.
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 3:16 pm
And to the rest of you, hope your day is as beautiful and sunny as it is here. Have a good one, folks. Cheers =)
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 3:15 pm
That's strange. I coulda sworn I heard something...but after that long silence, I guess... nah, it's just the wind.And a lovely March breeze it is and continues to be =) Oh, well...tires filled. check. Procrastination satisfied.check.On with my bike trek
calron - March 8, 2015, 2:59 pm
So you not only completely missed my point here, as well as several arguments elsewhere, and then launched an Ad Hominem based off of untrue statements and attempted some poisoning the well.
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 2:56 pm
The only thing flatter than this bike tire I'm pumping is your attempt at argumentation. At least make it interesting. I get you want my attention. But you're getting boring. Cheers
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 2:54 pm
The only thing flatter than bike this tire I'm pumping is your attempt at argumentation. At least make it interesting. You're getting boring.
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 2:52 pm
...You are a climate change denier, mate. I get it. But if you want me to take you seriously, at least be honest about it. At least those 'scientists' and liberals you are challenging can be honest about their stance and take a stand.
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 2:49 pm
...the funny thing about you, you claim to be "undecided" on climate change yet you only offer arguments against, never for. You offer evidence from breibart and other conservative sites, something a truly independent person would never do...
fauxnews - March 8, 2015, 2:48 pm
*yawn* In the summer of 2005, Media Research Center launched the tabloid NewsBusters, a conservative website "dedicated to exposing & combating liberal media bias," Yeah...they're not biased...
calron - March 8, 2015, 2:43 pm
That's up there with, "This storm proves global warming." that I hear all the time. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/02/12/blizzard-lies-ii-global-warming-snow-dallas-shatters-record

natural climate change -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 1.95/5

More politifakes by OTC

Sore losers make the best toys -


Climate Alarmism -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.8/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - May 10, 2015, 12:29 am
No, that's wraithfull with two Ls. http://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/dost/wraithfull :P

Global Warming Is Junk Science -

Global Warming Deniers Ignore Latest SCIENCE -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.8/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 8, 2015, 3:17 am
And here's the full list of reb***als for all three. http://www.populartechnology.net/2014/12/all-97-consensus-studies-refuted-by.html
calron - March 7, 2015, 8:58 pm
calron - March 7, 2015, 8:56 pm
calron - March 7, 2015, 8:37 pm
No, the Cook number where proved false in a peer reviewed study that you have seen before. So it looks like you forget facts that to not align with your world view.
fauxnews - March 7, 2015, 8:19 pm
I have a long drive ahead of me. Thank you for dropping in and commenting on my politifake. Cheers =)
fauxnews - March 7, 2015, 8:17 pm
According to the mainstream scientific community it is not debunked. And not according to the conclusions of science.Only according to a handful of junk scientists, and maybe in your mind.You can have your own set of opinions,but not your own set of facts
calron - March 7, 2015, 5:06 pm
I see you are still using the debunked Cook numbers. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/14/a-new-study-shows-climate-skeptics-have-more-knowledge-on-climate-science-than-alarmists/

W e i - H a c k - S o o n -

the reason we still have climate change -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.73/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - March 24, 2015, 11:02 am
I sure did! But I brought my BIKE instead. ;-) Good times. My last hurrah before my big job a**ignment.
OTC - March 22, 2015, 12:32 pm
Faux claims the conclusion of science is that humans are causing climate change, but I get attacked and called a crackpot Rep denier for lusting in #73920 human (man-made) CO2 sources, lol. liberalism is a mental disease
calron - March 21, 2015, 3:21 pm
The Earth is an oblate spheroid, rather than round.
OTC - March 19, 2015, 10:09 pm
Are you gonna ride your Mountain Mike while there?
OTC - March 19, 2015, 10:08 pm
Everything I listed has nothing to do with political opinion
fauxnews - March 19, 2015, 7:16 pm
Speaking of volancoes... going to the Hawaiian islands to visit some extended family! =) Speak with you blokes sometime next week. Faux, signing off. Cheers
fauxnews - March 19, 2015, 7:12 pm
Well..those things have nothing to do with the 'conclusion' of science that man-made climate change caused by CO2 is unequivocal. But those things have everything to do w/your cognitive dissonance.Stop confusing political opinion with scientific consensus
OTC - March 19, 2015, 5:23 pm
So orbital cycles and solar cycles and volcano eruptions and earthquakes and el Nino have nothing to do with science?
fauxnews - March 19, 2015, 2:08 pm
*yawn*No,OTC. Not according to the liberals.And according to you crackpot Repub deniers. But according to virtually every reputable SCIENTIST on the planet. Your inability to understand or tolerate the science isn't the same thing as it being wrong. ;-)
OTC - March 19, 2015, 12:14 pm
Oh liberals understand the interactions of various cycles, but according to them its the industrial revolution cycle, driving a fossil fueled vehicle cycle, using incandescent bulbs cycle, drilling for oil cycle, etc etc
ipaprime - March 19, 2015, 9:25 am
Yeah Liberals just don't understand that our climate changes naturally over time according to the interaction of various cycles and how they interact with each other.

The Problem with Climate Change Deniers -

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 1.73/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 2:25 pm
When you figure out which one it is, John Kerry, I'll be around. In the meanwhile, until then, see comment #73222. Cheers =)
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 2:24 pm
I guess if u have a hard time explaining your gender after implying once you were a woman then oddly backtracking on that, I cant expect you to take a stand on a more complicated issue like: whether you were AGAINST climate change before you were FOR it
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 2:18 pm
Oct2013,OTCsaid,"Why do scientists ignore the fact the arctic ice caps are growing?How can they grow wih a degree or two of warmer temps?" And now you are saying all along you think #72884"Climate change is real" when it is clear at one point you didn't?
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 2:14 pm
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 2:12 pm
LOL...Noooo. Or maybe I was just rubbing it in how not even your own side is onboard with you anymore. Sorta like how you went from being completely against climate change to suddenly saying you just against the man-made part of GW #FLIPFLOPMOMENTS
OTC - February 26, 2015, 2:03 pm
Yet in comment #72568 you made mention of Republicans (politicians) for a GW argument
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 12:35 pm
Yeah, let's listen to the politicians. God forbid we listen to the scientists. :rolleyes:
fauxnews - February 26, 2015, 12:35 pm
In 75, most people were tripping on LSD and wearing polyester pants.
Bandit5906 - February 26, 2015, 11:16 am
Al Gore said it would be ice free by 2013.
Bandit5906 - February 26, 2015, 11:14 am
in '75 they wanted to pour soot over the Arctic ice cap to help it melt. Because science

global warming Denial and kool-aid sippers -

R E A L I T Y C H E C K -

Epic -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.62/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:29 pm
haha..That was good. We should coordinate, make some kickass posters together. :-) I'm a big of all things fantasy. Hit me up sometime, peace out!
calron - April 11, 2015, 9:27 pm
P.S. Closely check the red text at the bottom tight of the Gollum poster. :)
calron - April 11, 2015, 9:26 pm
Never said that you called me that, but you did use the term. It's hard to determine the emotions of someone on the internet because of the lack of cues that are normally used, and I've been clear several times. I'm neither upset nor annoyed.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:23 pm
P.S. Have a good night. :-) Remember...quid pro quo, Clarice. ;-)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:20 pm
Sounds like cat has your tongue, mate. No worries. Not really much left to say. If you want more from me, you will have to build the appropriate level of trust. That's how life works. Have a good one, mate! Like your Gollum poster BTW. Epic ;-)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:19 pm
You would make it appear as if you are upset,or at least,highly annoyed with me. IF not, you should've made yourself clear. As for me? I'm happy as a clam. I'm enjoying this very much. Very amusing :-D Everything is coming up Milhouse for me,mate :-)(2/2)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:15 pm
Uh, where did I call you a crybaby whiner? The pigeon chess remark was a playful punch in the arm. :-) Sorry if you took it the wrong way. You went out of your way to disrupt a conversation I was having with another to inject an accusation against me(1/2)
calron - April 11, 2015, 9:12 pm
LoL, so after saying "pigeon chess" and "crybaby whiner" you claim that I'm the getting overly negative and emotional.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:04 pm
Rather, I enjoy the back and forth spirit of parody and competitive rivalry of this site. It wouldn’t be politifake, let alone politics, without that! Goes with the territory. Stop turning everything into pigeon chess over petty things.(2/2)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:04 pm
I can “inductively reason” that you are proving the point of this poster alright with your tantrum. ;-) Lighten up. I don’t get ALL b.utthurt over YOUR memes which are sometimes reactions to something I said.(1/2)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 9:03 pm
LOL..Noooooo...not "hoop jumping." :-) Just dont trust you enough to answer your sneaky self-incriminating questions.You are confusing healthy personal boundaries with dancing around a subject. I'll be DIRECT with you about what I think about THIS debate-
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:59 pm
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:55 pm
I'm not on the site 100% of the time, or do I have help. But thanks for the a**umptions that you have no way to verify.
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:54 pm
So hoop jumping, LOL. And you also used "leading questions" wrong. You can rephrase the question if you really wish and then answer it yourself.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:50 pm
Can't you get the people helping you write your answers to work faster? I don't have all night. ;-)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:44 pm
You are entitled to that opinion. But if you care about what I think, here it is - I refuse to answer your LEADING questions until you make it worth my while. Happy? :-) But I'm willing to offer you general statements about my and my raison d'etre. Fair?
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:38 pm
I'm not the one dancing around the questions.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:36 pm
To quote you, "Nope." Anyhow, you are not in a position of authority to make me do anything. So if it's attention and information from me you want, you will have to earn it. You are playing this poorly. So more pigeon chess from you?
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:35 pm
So hoop jumping. I already spelled it out, I'm asking why you copy me and then say you're not.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:32 pm
Spell out your agenda, mate. You are still being vague. I don't owe you anything. So make it worth my while. What are you hoping to accomplish in your conservation with me, and then I will consider answering any questions you have.
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:29 pm
Homesty isn't really subjective, just the perception of such which might not match reality. Anyway, I would like to hear why you copied my poster title and why your keep quoting me and saying you do not refer to me?
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:27 pm
found = fought
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:26 pm
Don't turn this into one of your infamous games of pigeon chess. Again, give me a baseline. You need to be clearer than that mate.(2/2)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:25 pm
Define audience. Honesty is subjective, I could accuse you of the same. But on a parody website, there are too many distractions. It's like accusing Andy Kaufman of lying when he found Jerry Lawler on Letterman. What's the point? Distill this for me (1/2)
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:23 pm
Well, I'm not angry. Any point would be the the audience, that you might not be being honest with them.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:22 pm
Okay, I'll drop the playful sarcasm and spell it out for you: What debate, exactly, do you want? Give me a baseline.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:18 pm
BTW do you actually have a point with your angry tirade?
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:18 pm
Notice how you didn't actually refute or even address anything I said, but choose to walk the path of ridicule instead.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:15 pm
So....I need to get licensing permission from you now to make a Lord of the Rings parody? X-D Nice to meet you Mr.Tolkien.
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:10 pm
calron - April 11, 2015, 8:09 pm
I that way you started on a LotR poster that had the exact same title as mine in the report section, erased it, and then made this one?
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:06 pm
Bobby, feel free to ignore the OP who tried to be speak on my behalf. I've been parodying climate change denial long before he was even a member here. I was in a Lord of the Rings mood. Yes, I'm a geek. Have a good one, mate. Cheers =)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 8:03 pm
The OP wasn't even speaking to you.You twisted the question into an excuse to complain about this poster which frankly has nothing to do w/you personally. I think ALL deniers are funny and ripe for parody.As you know,it's a parody website.So sue me(2/2)
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 7:42 pm
I'm parodying the climate change debate and the parts of it that amuse me, mate. You are free to see whatever personal interpretation you want in my posters. I don't have to prove to you what I was thinking at the time I was making that poster.(1/2)
calron - April 11, 2015, 7:37 pm
calron - April 11, 2015, 7:35 pm
Didn't say i know what you're think, just made a inductive argument. Nice how you resorted to personal attacks over any actual refutation and notice gave the same line you used when you quoted me and how it matches what you said here.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 7:30 pm
*yawn* That's a negative, mate. I thought you were big on not "pretending to know what others are thinking." ;-) Tsk, tsk. You coulda just asked. You are falling apart at the seams today, mate. Losing your cool and everything. ;-)
calron - April 11, 2015, 7:29 pm
calron - April 11, 2015, 7:28 pm
Here's the evidence, http://www.politifake.org/sore-losers-mak-science-deniers-climate-change-politics-62404.html
calron - April 11, 2015, 7:23 pm
Given his history he's is likely implying that I a republican science denier, despite me not being republican or deigning science because I disagree with something someone said about climate change.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 7:00 pm
To answer your question: parody of climate change debate and perceptions: nothing more and nothing less. I know many Republicans who do NOT deny science. I also know of many liberal science deniers who are anti-vaxxers. If the shoe fits, ya know? Cheers
BobbyLuau - April 11, 2015, 6:58 pm
thank you. I probably won't be posting much, just trying to see who is who here and get some feel for what's what.
fauxnews - April 11, 2015, 6:54 pm
Hi Bobby! Welcome to politifake :-)
BobbyLuau - April 11, 2015, 6:49 pm
is your claim that all republicans are science deniers or all science deniers are republican?

Facts -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.53/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

inflatedego - November 25, 2017, 8:52 am
Nothing has been the same since those polar icecaps melted, huh?
OTC - March 14, 2015, 10:06 pm
what are the credentials of the "Science crowd", "I'm a subscriber to 'Popular Science'."?
calron - March 14, 2015, 7:29 pm
I never joined, therefor was not asked to leave. Looks more like a cross post troll in action.
Dwydwyyr - March 14, 2015, 7:24 pm
You're right. If enough people LIKE YOU joined, it wouldn't be a science crowd anymore. Which is why you were asked to leave. http://www.thescienceforum.com/introductions/48702-hi.html One time arguing with you was enough, thanks. Au revoir, Ron.
calron - March 14, 2015, 7:23 pm
From your website, "So Calron was EmmaRoydes from politifake.org? ROFL"
calron - March 14, 2015, 7:17 pm
Fell free to post an actually argument and/or facts they presented that they presented for review.
calron - March 14, 2015, 7:16 pm
You have not shown that my arguments have not held up. Rather you posted a link to a forum that requires membership, and if I can join that means that it is not necessarily the "science crowd", but a appeal to irreverent authority.
Dwydwyyr - March 14, 2015, 7:15 pm
-despite you pretending (falsely and dishonestly) that you actually know what you are speaking about. YOUR OPINION. Now you know. CWYL
Dwydwyyr - March 14, 2015, 7:13 pm
Not even. Pointing out, rather, that your arguments didn't hold up (at all) when presented to an actual science crowd. I could care less about you. It was always about your arguments - which failed spectacularly when scrutinized by actual scientists. FACT
calron - March 14, 2015, 7:09 pm
Well you're into claiming I did things I didn't and trying a appeal to authority to cover yourself.
Dwydwyyr - March 14, 2015, 7:05 pm
Not according to an actual science crowd, Ron. Like when you took us up on our invitation and TESTED your credibility with us. www.thescienceforum.com/trash-can/48703-why-does-scientific-community-continue-promote-consensus-man-made-climate-change.html
calron - March 14, 2015, 6:56 pm
So "Science isn't a popularity contest." but " not shared by the majority of the scientific community" So you rely on Ad Hominems to dismiss info you do not like and even contradict yourself. This is indicative of cognitive bias.
Dwydwyyr - March 14, 2015, 6:32 pm
Tsk.All you have are bogus links to non-scientific sites promoting a mindset not shared by the majority of the scientific community and typically promoted by fools and people with something to gain from continuing destructive practices regarding resources
Dwydwyyr - March 14, 2015, 6:30 pm
@Calron"A new study shows climate skeptics have more knowledge on climate science than alarmists" This appears to be a survey of the general public. But even if it were a survey of scientists, so what? Science isn't a popularity contest.
calron - March 14, 2015, 5:54 pm
Additionally he has been caught red handed leaving out studies that should have been included. http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/04/13950-meaningless-search-results.html
calron - March 14, 2015, 5:52 pm
They are suppose to all support MMGW, but it doesn't rules out those that say that natures hand in it is bigger. It is basically a test search and not a through review.
OTC - March 14, 2015, 5:41 pm
How many of those 13,926 articles state global warming is a natural event and not "man-made"?
calron - March 14, 2015, 5:06 pm
So your still confusing numbers with science and then s******ing numbers that meet your predetmained ideas with facts checking them. http://www.workplacebullying.org/2012/12/12/climate/

If Hillary dyed her hair green, would she look like the Joker? -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - May 10, 2015, 12:41 am
Ice cream causing murders would explain why why batman hates it so much, http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_kyPhEiYq2tM/RmBJ2k1jbqI/AAAAAAAAAF8/-BA4cS6rnNw/s320/batmanhatesicecream.jpg
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 11:04 am
The difference, denier, is those journals are very clear in that they require the researchers to disclose their funding. Dr.(lol) Soon did not. Could you two-step around your lost argument a little more please? :)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 1:25 am
and your "research" just so happens to backup the claims made by the people paying you?
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 7, 2015, 1:24 am
So tell me the difference between getting paid by a corporation or a government when you don't reveal where that money came from?
fauxnews - May 6, 2015, 8:19 pm
you wouldn't support ANY politician - including anyone who runs against Hillary in the upcoming election OR any Republican you voted for in the past because, wait for it....they were paid by- wanna take a wild guess, mate? ;-) (2/2)
fauxnews - May 6, 2015, 8:17 pm
Conspiracy theory rubbish. Dr. Wei-Hack Soon had failed, in a string of scientific papers, to disclose his funding from a coal-burning utility and other fossil-fuel interests. If you really believed the "gubmint paying people" makes a person biased (1/2)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 6, 2015, 7:22 pm
Ah, did all of the "scientists" reveal how much money the government is paying them for their "research"? You know, so you can make another poster like: http://www.politifake.org/will-produce-wei-hock-soon-climate-denial-meme-politics-62240.html
rebeccaolsen - May 6, 2015, 10:49 am
The "man-made part" is unequivocal according to their research. So, yes, to deny IT is to deny science. But don't worry - WE are just telling what the science SAYS. You have the freedom to deny it all you want. Hopefully that clears it up, denier. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 6, 2015, 10:41 am
A real "fact" - MMCC is unequivocal according to the scientific research on the subject. The debate ended for them LONG ago. What makes you a denier is your refusal to acknowledge the scientific consensus and the mountain of peer-reviewed studies.
rebeccaolsen - May 6, 2015, 10:36 am
That's a negative, Ghostrider. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof." UFOs, Bigfoot, conspiracy theories, etc. Simply putting the word FACT into your comment isn't enough sweetie. You will have to do better than that
freasy - May 6, 2015, 9:42 am
Fact, the data was fudged, proven over again. Sorry. Oh they don't deny climate change, I say climate change is normal. It happens, little ice age, Mediaval warming and others. Just deny man made.
fauxnews - May 5, 2015, 1:15 pm
*yawn* The data was fudged, Freasy. There isn't some massive conspiracy from the scientists. If it were true, and that much data, among that many scientists, was fudged then Republicans really are idiots because the scientists are getting away with it
freasy - May 5, 2015, 12:41 pm
Bottom line, the data was fudged. Lies Lies and d***ed lies.

Science Proves Global Warming Is A Myth -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 1.44/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - March 7, 2015, 5:02 pm
So you asked every scientist ever, even the dead ones? Or are you perhaps using a No True Scotsman to dismiss scientific opinions that you do n ot agree with?

Republican Science Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www www
Rating: 1.27/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

DebtToAmerica - April 26, 2015, 12:10 am
it draws focus away from the fact that the light absorbtion spectrums of atmospheric gases are well known, as are the wavelengths at which blackbody radiation (heat which can be picked up by thermal cameras) radiates heat back into space.
DebtToAmerica - April 26, 2015, 12:02 am
i dont think we should put much faith in climate models, their complexity makes them unreliable for quantitative predictions, and creates a false impression that the model is neccesary to support the hypothesis of anthropogenic climate change.
Bandit5906 - April 25, 2015, 8:15 pm
Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures The Global Warming Policy Foundation has enlisted an international team of five distinguished scientists to carry out a full inquiry = fraud
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:20 pm
And Limbaugh and his devoted listeners are a bunch lying idiots - is all I was saying hun. The only alternative was to never entertain his politically motivated smear against science in the first place. I concur with the rest sweetie.
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:16 pm
No the alternative is not to trust anyone else. I've already concluded that the info likely does not invalidate the ICP report based on what I've found.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:12 pm
And the authors of the Duke University study also clarified,"So this result does not contradict the IPCC conclusions at all.Authors noted that"the study actually confirms humans' role in driving global warming" calling denier's claims to be "ridiculous."
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:11 pm
Well - the alternative is to trust Limbaugh then, who is a f***ing lying idiot. Stop playing dumb. Only an idiot would disagree with that. Unless you want to outright expose your right-wing bias, let's say this safely cancels out Limbaugh's take on this.
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:09 pm
“Our model shows these wiggles can be big enough that they could have accounted for a reasonable portion of the accelerated warming we experienced from 1975 to 2000, as well as the reduced rate in warming that occurred from 2002 to 2013.”
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:07 pm
While I'm here, here's a lay article on the study: https://nicholas.duke.edu/news/global-warming-more-moderate-worst-case-models
calron - April 25, 2015, 3:07 pm
I've said several times that natural variability could explain the pause without invalidating AGW. :) And I'm lothed to trust MMA do to there biases, so I would prefer another source.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 3:01 pm
Limbaugh and the other deniers are using this to conflate a phony debate that doesnt exist.Science isnt pretending to be infallible or above skepticism.But after their extensive research hun it's reasonable to infer MMCC is unequivocal based on their work
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:59 pm
And the authors of the Duke University study also clarified,"So this result does not contradict the IPCC conclusions at all.Authors noted that"the study actually confirms humans' role in driving global warming" calling denier's claims to be "ridiculous."
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:58 pm
One of the Duke study's authors, Duke doctoral candidate Patrick Brown has been very vocal in his denouncement over Limbaugh's remarks and lies. Brown emailed Media matters himself. I doubt they are making it up. They are just carrying the story.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:57 pm
P.S. It does say that the middle ground models should still be accurate.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:55 pm
As it is, the study basically says natural variability throws the models off, http://www.nature.com/srep/2015/150421/srep09957/full/srep09957.html
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:52 pm
I'm having trouble finding a source for that quote other than Media Matters for America, do you have a link?
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 11:50 pm
So, yeah, great source you chose there deniers. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 11:50 pm
The authors of the Duke University study also clarified,"So this result does not contradict the IPCC conclusions at all." They also said it's "wrong" to attribute recent warming to solar activity,and added that human activity is a much bigger contributor.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 11:47 pm
Yeah, Rush Limbaugh jumped on this. Taking it out of context ENTIRELY. And one of the actual Duke authors noted that "the study actually confirms humans' role in driving global warming" calling denier's claims to be "ridiculous."
Bandit5906 - April 24, 2015, 10:47 pm
Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are down to ‘natural variability’, says study Duke University

Republican Science Deniers -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 1.27/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

OTC - April 25, 2015, 11:58 pm
You were mimicking me mimicking the left. Snow happens and you're right, it's not proof of climate change, but the climate is changing., its just not changing according to the climate models
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 10:17 pm
If you really wanted to mimic the left(since they at least aint stupid enough to confuse snow outside their window as proof against MMCC)then why don't you make fun of the left's anti-vaxxers?That denial is loaded with material, as dumb at the CC deniers.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 10:15 pm
The 'fail' here, OTC, is that the left isn't clearly sarcastic about MMCC in the same way as the right is. This clearly is not mimicking the left. Rather it's sarcasm. The problem is that it's not funny.It comes off as stupid and completely unaware of it
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 10:12 pm
Nope, OTC. What's truly "hilarious" is that you think you are effectively mocking the left when you are about as funny as Bernard Goldberg when he tries his hand at comedy. Bernie thinks he's a rightwing Al Franken. More like a real life Al Bundy. X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 10:10 pm
Well...I parody both sides. But I lean left because there is so much rightwing content here already. My posters speak for themselves. I wouldn't be doing something right if you could tell that easily, mate ;-)
calron - April 25, 2015, 9:27 pm
FN has said that he is intentionally parodying the left. I'm not sold on that, but it is plausible.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 9:04 pm
(comment #72648)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 8:58 pm
What's hilarious is I was mimicking liberal responses to extreme weather being caused by global warming. Glad you finally see how stupid it is, even if you listed the wrong political party
Bandit5906 - April 25, 2015, 8:17 pm
Making the people who made millions out of manipulating the data criminals and all frauds!