Over 59654

Global Politics


TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.93/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

OTC - May 22, 2014, 3:05 pm
So they were partly correct, there was a flooding, but not with water, no?

TUSCON, ARIZONA 2/22/2013 - Accenture Golf Tournament postponed due to snow. Just another day of man-made Global Warming Hell. It's all your fault. Repent!

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 4.23/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

Jamison12 - August 31, 2014, 8:54 pm
There's a difference between weather and climate.
StoneTools - September 8, 2013, 7:16 pm

BLIZZARD OF 2013 - Global warming: causes less snow, except when it causes more snow!

TAGS: www www
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by JGalt

" CRAZY CANUCKS THEY DO EXIST " - You know you're in Canada when, a driver passes you in a convertible during a snowstorm.

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.76/5

More politifakes by MFS

THE POLL RESULTS ARE IN! - 9 out of 10 Polar Bears surveyed think Al Gore is full of crap!

Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -

Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -


Warmist Insanity: Climate Change Is Causing Child Marriage -

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

INCONVENIENT TRUTH - Geologic history shows there is nothing "unprecedented" about today's temperatures or CO2 levels. Actually, we're still a bit on the low side.


Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward

VANISHING SEA ICE - Another stunning predictive success for Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory. Uh huh.

Eco-Pope Francis -

DEAR AL GORE - Effective immediately, please remove my name from the membership list of the Church of the Sacred Global Warming.

Wonder what their planning now? -

Idiot In Chief Obama -


TAGS: www www
Rating: 4.76/5

More politifakes by OTC

Man-made global warming fraud -

Liberal Science Deniers -

SEA ICE VANISHING? - Only for the people that get their "science" from the "D" science student Al Gore. http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/SEAICE/ Case Closed.

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.8/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

StoneTools - June 28, 2013, 10:01 am
Wow! Me likey!
Capt. Morgan - January 29, 2013, 2:44 am
An interesting Olive Branch with wiggle room for both. But here is a hint - an article that will show you how to win over the folks open to persuasion: http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2013/01/Ridley-Ten-Tests.pdf
JGalt - January 28, 2013, 4:17 am
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 11:25 pm
Capt, lets end this. We both agree that global warming is occurring and that human activity maybe exacerbating a normal cyclical event. Fair enough?
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 7:42 pm
Sorry, double hit
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 7:41 pm
I thought you agreed that the earth has been warming over the last century.
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 7:37 pm
I thought you agreed that the earth has been warming over the last century.

APPARENTLY THE SCIENCE IS NOT SETTLED - Former NASA scientists and astronauts send letter to NASA Administrator "We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”

UNPRECEDENTED WARMING! - You be the judge.

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

Renza - February 13, 2013, 10:32 pm
Cause failing to understand or acknowledge things makes them not true.

MILESTONES - Five years since a hurricane landfall in the United States. Hasn't happened since 1910-1914. The Prophecy Fail continues.

GLOBAL WARMING - Just gets worse and worse doesn't it?

TAGS: www www
Rating: 4.22/5

More politifakes by Lboy


Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -


TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.75/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 3:12 pm
Funny. hee hee Great! I don't agree with the politics around it but this still made me LOL. His reindeer should be tanning in the background. The only thing missing.

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)

Past liberal crisis predictions didn't happen -

CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX - Only the Mainstream Media, extreme left and the scarecrow still support this scam. Sadly, they all suffer from the same condition.

Global Warming Denial -

Loony Liberals -


Five million years of fluctuation -


NASA – CO2 is a Global Coolant -

YET ANOTHER PROPHECY FAIL - Sea ice record set in 2010 (NASA's "warmest year ever") shattered just two years later. Search continues for the UN's 50 million climate refugees.


GLOBAL WARMING RALLY - Has been cancelled due to winter blizzards.

TAGS: www www
Rating: 4.41/5

More politifakes by OTC

COLD AND SNOW RECORDS - According to Al Gore, they are caused by too much heat. Uh huh.

Ireland's Parliament calls Obama a "war criminal" & "hypocrite of the century"... -


TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3.53/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:49 pm
What's the Washington post have to do with anything? Im just teasing you for replying to yourself in a post like Norman Bates. You even quoted yourself, schizoboy. http://www.politifake.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9611&start=80#p138776
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:46 pm
the washington post? What's the problem with that? Oh, they don't do the chicken little thing. Now I understand. You would much rather use the Comedy channel, right?
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:44 pm
I think you should change your avatar to the sky falling and your name here to chicken little. It would be much more apropo
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:42 pm
Like talking to yourself, conspiracy boy? Oh, that's right, you do. http://www.politifake.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=9611&start=80#p138776 I will consider the source on this one. Your tinfoil hat is cutting off O2 from your brain again. x-D FTW
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:19 pm
You read and quote from the comedy channel ... so you tell me manmade climate conspiracy boy.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:06 pm
You read and quote from the UK Daily Mail...so you tell me, conspiracy boy. Normally, this is where I'd say, you need to calm down and smoke one out but then again you probably read from there that pot will melt your brain. So never mind. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:58 pm
So, tell me, faux, did your education in britain entail nothing other than conspiracy sites and reading National Enquirer for your study materials?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 2:55 pm
*yawn* If you did have classes in science, then either you failed out or you are living proof that the American education system has failed. Nah, keep those tissues. Sounds like you still need it. I'd cry too if I had your report card. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:49 pm
At least I had classes in science. You just spout what your favorite conspiracy magazine headlines. Reality is just a word to you, not an actual occurrence. Did you already go thru all of those tissues that were donated to you?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 2:18 pm
Nah, because you don't believe in FACTS. You define facts as anything you choose to believe in. FACT: 97-99% according to verified public record. We already know you get an F in science. Now you can make a complete set with your F+ in reality. X-D FTW
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:01 pm
97-99% in your mind, maybe. Nutty scientists are the ones that you are on board with. FACTS just destroy your manmade bs.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 1:03 pm
*slapping knee* I know,right? It's only a 97-99% consensus. Check this out...they also think the world's round. Yeah,right! That means people in China would be standing upside down.Nutty scientists and their liberal FACTS.God made the world flat. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 1:02 am
Unanimous? bwahahahahaha

GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS - Run around screaming before you check the facts and you'll get burned every tiem.

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 3.5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

SNOWPOCALYPSE 2011 - Major snow blizzards from Texas to the coast of Maine... Thank God for global warming- otherwise it could be a whole lot worse!

AL GORE - Somehow, he managed to succeed in making conservative Republicans care about science to a certain......degree.

THERE IS MORE PROOF FOR GLOBAL WARMING... - ...THAN THERE IS THAT JESUS (OR ANY MAN) COULD WALK ON WATER! [Don't let superstitious Republicans who believe in a zombie Jesus tell you what's scientifically accurate.]

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by unrealityanew

crankyhead - September 6, 2012, 5:44 pm
I guess you didn't go outside at all this summer freasy?
freasy - September 6, 2012, 4:32 pm
LMFAO What proof??? Doctored data and lies???

A George Soros Employee -

Climate Crusader DiCaprio -

OCTOBER 8TH WOLF CREEK, COLORADO - Earliest ever opening to ski season. How is that man-made global warming working for you?

2010 - Warmest ever? Unprecedented? Runaway warming? You humans have an amazingly short perspective. And for such big brains, some amazingly stupid ideas.

Climate Change Is The Global Crisis Key To Unlock The New World Order -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - May 5, 2015, 12:39 pm
Bottom line, the data was fudged. Lies Lies and d***ed lies.

FACTS BE DAMNED - Global warming exists 'cuz somewhere there is a pic of a polar bear looking sad and depressed.

2010 - NASA'S WARMEST YEAR EVER - Only by extensive data cherry-picking and manipulation. Apparently the calendars of Dr. James "Death Train" Hansen and his merry band of Druids don't go back very far.

YOU JUST MIGHT BE A LIBERAL - If you believe 10 years of global cooling proves global warming


RECORDS - Cold and snow records continue to fall across the northern hemisphere. How is that Global Warming working for you?

A BAGHDAD BOB MOMENT - Obama doubles down on the AGW Hoax and rushes towards his own Baghdad Bob moment in Copenhagen.

How stupid are conservatives? -

CHEMTRAILS - If Global Warming is a hoax, then the contrails you see from airplanes is nothing more than jet engine exhaust.

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Renza - March 17, 2013, 11:18 am
It's clearly a liberal media conspiracy, there's no other possible explanation in the universe.
terroraustralis - March 16, 2013, 9:36 pm
anwar awalaki, and his son. it doesnt matter that they were terrorists. they were american citizens, and they got no trial whatsoever. the founding fathers would be rolling in their graves.
PapaFox - March 16, 2013, 11:24 am
Entrails! I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that the mass media has ignored this!
Renza - March 16, 2013, 10:38 am
Who has he a**assinated? especially considering he'd just have someone else do it for him. everyone knows the secret service offers the presidents 3 secret murders per term.
Cannabal - March 16, 2013, 8:09 am
I thought liberals were supposed to have a sense of humor.
terroraustralis - March 16, 2013, 12:28 am
i didnt say he was a nutjob for making fun of chemtrail loons. i said it makes him a hypocrite, because he beleives things that are equally stupid, like "obama is a socialist", rather than just a bad president who a**asinates US citizens illegally.
Renza - March 15, 2013, 7:42 am
People can go on about chemtrails/contrails all they want, but we should be way more concerned about entrails, turns out they've found a way into all animals on the planet! Deer trails too... they're trying to make an infrastructure!
Renza - March 15, 2013, 7:40 am
I hate contrails because the pilots suck at drawing in the sky, it's just a bunch of crappy white lines on a blue background >.
Cannabal - March 14, 2013, 9:32 am
I'm about the most reasonable nutjob you'll ever talk to, man.
PapaFox - March 14, 2013, 7:43 am
I doubt he's a nutjob for making fun of chemtrail conspiracy loons.
terroraustralis - March 14, 2013, 7:32 am
if you consider cannabal to be a nutjob, and think that you yourself arent, then you're a hypocrite
terroraustralis - March 14, 2013, 7:30 am
we're all conspiracy theorists, to a degree. some people hate obama, some people hate republicans, some people hate contrails, i hate the bipartisan fraud being perpetuated by the ignorance of the average american voter.
PapaFox - March 14, 2013, 7:29 am
It never ceases to amaze me what people choose to be paranoid about.
JGalt - March 14, 2013, 6:36 am
funny story- a guy who's convinced that contrails are poison- I said its moisture- he said "moisture evaporates" and I said: "you mean like clouds do?" LOL

GLOBAL WARMING ! - Children won't know what snow is ! Meanwhile we all know what it is !

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by MFS

Yoda Wisdom -

EXTREME WEATHER RECORDS AND GLOBAL WARMING - Once again the data shows Anthropogenic Global Warming to be the Religion of the Stupid.

warming or cooling? -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

fckoffmooooooo - June 6, 2014, 1:52 am

THIS CHART - Won't change any ones opinion on global warming. People already believe what there going to believe.

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

ipaprime - April 9, 2013, 8:26 am
very nice at least you seem to have an inquiring mind

scientists agree -

science consensus -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

Curlyrocks - July 11, 2014, 12:54 pm
I think with all the drugs people flush down the toilet mother nature has gotten more than a handful of midol and some stronger s**t. In fact I think she's probably trippen on all the over prescribed pain meds.
EmmaRoydes - July 11, 2014, 11:47 am
I think Mother Nature is suffering from PMS. Nothing a handful of Midol won't fix.
OTC - July 11, 2014, 1:24 am
Why is it so out of the question that the earth is just going through a natural cycle?
Zeitguy - June 27, 2014, 12:39 am
My mistake.
EmmaRoydes - June 26, 2014, 6:26 pm
I didn't say Nazi, I said Nazis :)
Zeitguy - June 26, 2014, 4:54 pm
What about abusing the word Nazi.
EmmaRoydes - June 26, 2014, 1:50 pm
Maybe it's because GW Nazis keep abusing the word significant.
Zeitguy - June 26, 2014, 1:11 am
Why is it so out of the question that human activity can play a significant role in adversely affecting the immediate environment?


" 05 MAY 2012 SCOTLAND " - Obama "I will be very clear in voicing my belief that we're going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way."

For a second there, -

Weather Warning -

Minnesota Fishing Season Opens May 11 -

Patterns -

IF GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL AND COASTAL CITIES WILL INEVITABLY BE DESTROYED, - then why isn't the US government setting aside gobs of land in places like this for the soon to be displaced coasties?

if man-made global warming was to bring major hurricanes -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 9:53 pm

Yet I somehow make it worse......
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 9:51 pm

Don't I look silly now that the trou Don't I look silly now that the troublemakers comments have been deleted.....I should learn to take my own advice.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 5:15 pm

So, you're done now?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 5:07 pm

Calm down Emma. Try the strawberry rhubarb.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 23, 2014, 4:08 pm

I like blueberry pie the best, but I wouldn't say no to lemon meringue.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 22, 2014, 11:20 pm

So........ No?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 22, 2014, 9:37 pm

I take it you don't plan to be mature about this?
OTC - November 5, 2014, 7:52 pm
We're still waiting to see Al Gore's scientific credentials
crankyhead - November 3, 2014, 5:24 pm
Mooo, not to b*** in, but, I for one can't wait to see how he twists this to try to blame his own behaviour on you or me or someone else.
crankyhead - November 3, 2014, 5:22 pm
… to refute the 'facts' as he's presented them, there actually have to be some 'facts' presented. Y'know, logic?
crankyhead - November 3, 2014, 5:21 pm
Oh, he's a meteorologist is he? Perhaps you'd like to kindly tell us which institution gave him his degree? Also, still waiting for you to point out the SCIENTIFIC research he supposedly did, to support his UNSUBSTANTIATED opinion. Ergo; in order...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 31, 2014, 8:56 pm

It was only a week long ban. You could have just toughed it out and come back. I'm glad we get to see this side of you though, it's a far cry from all of those pm's you've sent me trying to be my pal and kissing my a**.
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:11 pm
…it is that you live in?
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:11 pm
…think, is he? Hardly. Maybe it's also your a**ertion that every tofu eating, rainbow flag waving, tree hugging long hair in California can accurately represent the interests and ideology of whatever mid west, gun toting, sister kissing trailer park...
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:09 pm
www.thecanadaguide.com? That's the infallible evidence you're using to support your fallacy of composition, is it? Some 30 year old Vancouverite who has self admittedly never left the province is able to tell you what the fine folks of Newfoundland….
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:07 pm
…research, I'm sure everyone in the world will be happy to look over his proofs.
crankyhead - October 31, 2014, 2:07 pm
Hate to break it to ya, but John Coleman is a journalist, not a scientist. Let alone a 'top scientist', or even a "worlds top meteorological scientist', whatever it is you think that is. If you'd like to disagree, please just point out some of his….
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 30, 2014, 11:58 pm

Still Prime Minister champ. What else you got? What title did she hold before she became Prime Minister? Are you going to tell us she was the maid? pure ignorance.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 30, 2014, 10:27 pm

Kim Campbell was Canada's first Female prime Minister. 20 years ago......You are ignorant. We have many female and aboriginal leaders. Get your facts straight....again.
OTC - October 30, 2014, 7:23 pm
So you're saying that GOP obstructionism is based on racism?
OTC - October 30, 2014, 7:27 am
I was pointing out the stupid BS made by researchers who made the claim, like Al Gore's stupid BS about the ice caps melting by 2014
OTC - October 30, 2014, 7:19 am
Why bother? Because i think it's funny how there are plenty of stories how man made global warming is responsible for super hurricanes and they will be the new norm, and TA's attack on me seems to suggest i made those claims, so how can i take him serious
OTC - October 28, 2014, 11:23 am
And that, TA, is what the poster is referring to (roll eyes)
OTC - September 17, 2014, 9:45 pm
"the dogs of doom are howling more"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:17 pm
well, otc, looks like it's your turn to be attacked by the big bad scientist. Careful, his attack dogs are usually right behind him and I think they have rabies.
OTC - September 16, 2014, 12:06 pm
You're confused, you've been talking about Global Warming which i don't deny, I'm making fun of 'Man-Made' Global Warming, which i do deny. Totally different subjects.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 5:53 pm
"sarcastic" eh? so you're saying you arent a climate change denialist? because i dont see a single godd*** shred of sarcasm, i think you made it seriously, and now you're backpedalling because you realise how incredibly dumb it is.
OTC - September 11, 2014, 2:12 pm
wow, all this for you to justify this sarcastic poster about M-MGW and more severe hurricanes.
terroraustralis - September 10, 2014, 5:10 pm
and it pisses me off when people claim these hurricanes are proof of global warming, because they're just clouding the debate with even more unscientific bull****. being right for the wrong reasons is just as bad as being wrong.
terroraustralis - September 10, 2014, 4:59 pm
exactly. the confusion comes from the prediction that global warming will increase the intensity of hurricanes and allow them to appear further north, hurricane(s) katrina and sandy are antecdotal evidence of this, they dont prove or disprove anything.
EmmaRoydes - September 9, 2014, 2:39 pm
right on the money curly
Curlyrocks - September 9, 2014, 1:11 pm
A better a***ogy: a lack of any big hurricane in a year disproves GW is like saying a big hurricane would prove global warming. Hurricanes happen in the caribbean, it's the climate down there.
terroraustralis - September 9, 2014, 3:47 am
saying that the lack of a big hurricane in one year disproves global warming is like saying that the rise in government jobs proves that obama is fixing the economy.
terroraustralis - September 9, 2014, 3:45 am
the lack of big hurricanes in any one year does not prove global warming doesnt exist. my comment was intentionally wrong and stupid, to give you an idea of how wrong and stupid your poster looks to us. seriously, look at the comment directly below this.
OTC - September 8, 2014, 3:34 pm
Get your facts straight, Obama is NOT getting rid of ALL the jobs, just the private sector ones. I have a government job.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 11:56 pm
Emma, who is your "doodoo heads" reply directed at?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 9:46 pm
after all, you are an admitted flaming liberal
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 9:45 pm
speaking of doo doo heads, what do you do for a living besides welch off of other people's hard work and income?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 9:44 pm
You mean like the MTU definition: Computer science is a discipline that spans theory and practice. I don't deal in computer theory, I deal exclusively in hands on networking and programming.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 9:13 pm
You could always look up the definition of 'computer scientist' if you've got some issue with what I said. Before you do that though, you should alert your neighbors that you'll be flying into fit of rage, and that they shouldn't worry.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 9:10 pm
Considering that we were discussing your pot/kettle attitude, I think it's obvious that my 5 minutes of research did in fact, produce something useful, on-topic and sensible. No surprise to anyone that you disagree. #boohoomoments
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 2, 2014, 3:56 pm

You guys are boring. Why don't you talk about politics instead of arguing over who's the bigger doo doo head?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 3:43 pm
Sure, cranky, just like someone who has a baccalaureate in art is an artist, right?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 3:20 pm
might even come up with something useful, on-topic, or sensible for a change. Pretty doubtful that you could pull that off though.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 3:19 pm
I reply in kind to people like you who attack me. You just like to attack without provocation. Hence the stupidity you are exhibiting in this conversation. You should try to focus a little, take a moment, and think before you respond to comments. You
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:57 pm
Emma, people with degrees in computer science, are called 'computer scientists'. Just so's ya know, child.
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:56 pm
Yeah, we all see what you do, and as we've just established, ever since your "very first comment" on this site, you attack other members, and call them names and then cry like a stuck pig whenever someone dares to hold you to your own standards.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 1:40 pm
Nope, I said that I have a baccalaureate in computer science. I never claimed to be be a scientist of any kind. Do I need to explain the difference to you?
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 1:37 pm
All righty then. My comment where I referred to you as skippy happened in September, and you used it in your argument about when I first got here. Now do you see what I did there?
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:08 pm
Speaking of hallucinations, didn't you claim to be a computer scientist, around two week ago Emma?
crankyhead - September 2, 2014, 1:01 pm
Apparently, I understand calendars better than you do, Emma.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:29 am
rein in that ego. Life can suck when you think the internet is all about you or everyone is stupid compared to you, Einstein (or is that Epstein?)
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:28 am
waaaaah! my reputation with you is permanently ruined. How will I ever live with myself. I've never claimed to be a scientist, but if that's your most recent hallucination, go with it, it suits you just fine. In the meantime, stop trolling me and try to
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:27 am
avoid politics. It's not for the feint of heart.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:26 am
when did you hallucinations begin to think that I have an anti-science avatar? Why would I change it to annoy you? Your ego gets in the way of being a contributing member of this site by taking everything here as if it was directed at you. Toughen up or
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:25 am
just go to hell.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:24 am
I'm glad it annoys you even if it isn't true. I post . whenever the desire to post a comment strikes me. You want me to stop, become a mod, then you can be the egotistical a**hole that you play so well and you can decide who you want to post. Otherwise,
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:21 am
I didn't say I knew you were being sarcastic, I said you were being an a**hole. I've never pretended that I was you friend. It's not something I desire nor am I foolish enough to think the internet is my real life.
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 11:20 am
I didn't notice that you were a mod now. If memory serves me correctly, they are the only ones that can tell me whether or where I can post. Besides, THIS ISN'T EVEN YOUR POSTER, so WHY POST COMMENTS AT ALL?
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:52 am
And there is a reason I chose the words CONFIRMATION BIAS with you. you, i, and pretty much everyone else here knows that reason. So you can stop pretending to be stupid about that as well.
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:46 am
your reputation is permanently ruined with me. The only thing more laughable than you being a scientist is watching you pretend to be civil or my friend. I dont respect you, i despise you. Why? You're insincere AND proud of your confirmation bias
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:45 am
you even changed your avatar into an anti-science nutter one because you thought it would annoy me. troll much? so stop playing stupid. no one with integrity here is buying it. that's why only YOU believe in your own BS. i don't speak troll, only you do
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:45 am
and before you say "hurr durr,Im not a troll",you confessed to trolling when you said "But I now know that my posting caused your panties to get in a bunch, so I'll refrain from responding to any further responses you make" like all trolls,you're bragging
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:44 am
so now you're just following me around, harassing me in the way that has worked for you in the past. ill admit, it IS really, really, REALLY annoying, but you're not gonna provoke me into an outburst that will get me banned. your plan wont work.
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:44 am
You said you knew I was being sarcastic. Just like the way you know you were being phony by pretending to be civil and by pretending you were ever my friend. You are neither. Now you know this too. So commit it to memory OR at least admit you're trolling
terroraustralis - September 2, 2014, 10:43 am
then WHY REPLY AT ALL??? THIS ISNT EVEN YOUR POSTER. i wasn't talking to you. you know i dont care for your anti-science nutter views. so the only reason for you to say ANYTHING is because (a) you want to troll me or (b) you're pretending to be my friend
EmmaRoydes - September 2, 2014, 12:17 am
I take you don't know what month it is. It's ok, cranky, nobody expects you to understand calendars.
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 9:31 pm
September? What? #usemilkonyourcheeriosinsteadofwhiskey
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 7:57 pm
To me, your postings sound like sour gra**s. Did you get banned from the site? Did it make you cry? Do you miss the site? Do you miss me?
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 7:54 pm
Not that it's of any concern of yours, but I chose the name because I found it amusing. If you don't find it amusing, to quote your God, "sue me"
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 7:40 pm
I guess you have no sense of time, right? Which comes first, now think hard, April or September? tick tock
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 6:04 pm
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 5:35 pm
I guess 'Skippy' is a term of endearment now? =) #hooklineandsinker
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 5:34 pm
Pretty abrasive isn't it?
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 5:34 pm
The earliest post of mine that I could find was on April 19 where I said "Holy Crap! A Squirrel" http://www.politifake.org/globalcomments.php?p=65388
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 5:16 pm
Tell me, skippy, what was my very first post on this site?
crankyhead - September 1, 2014, 5:05 pm
Not willing to be held to her own standard, Emma posts this absolute gem of a retort, completely forgetting all about the tone and direction of her own "very first posting" on this website. #pot/kettle
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 2:00 pm
and as far as Julie goes, her very first posting on this site was attacking me. So your love for her and sorrow at seeing her go is totally lost on me anyway. Sounds like a "boo hoo" moment to me.
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 1:45 pm
But I now know that my posting caused your panties to get all bunched up, so I will refrain from responding to any further smart a** comments that you make. Bueno?
EmmaRoydes - September 1, 2014, 1:44 pm
I wasn't trying to initiate a discussion with you, nor do I wish to have you respect my views. I merely put it out there in response to a smart a** statement that you posted, nothing more, nothing less.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:41 pm
i didnt realise it at the time, but julie really took a bullet for me. the way you baited her let me see just how insidious and manipulative you really are. you're probably the most skilled troll i've ever had the misfortune of coming in contact with.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:36 pm
its like you're meticulously researched exactly what pisses me off the most, and figured out how to apply it perfectly... i should applaud you, its not often that trollbait fails by being too good...
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:34 pm
to put it more bluntly, i've never seen an argument so perfectly designed to make me explode. you wont trick me into swearing or insulting you, but you're doing too good of a job at rubbing me the wrong way, to not be trolling.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:24 pm
how am i supposed to believe that you want a serious discussion when you keep acting like this whole thing is a big joke? i've seen you form coherent arguments before, and yet you refuse to use a coherent argument with me.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 12:14 pm
you civil and try to initiate a discussion, and then you bring this to the table? thats like showing up to a barbecue with a tofu turkey and alcohol-free beer. how am i supposed to respect your views when you cite articles that oppose your argument?
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 11:58 am
what has me even more confused is the fact that you're citing an article that is in favour of the idea of manmade climate change. you dont believe a word these people say, and yet you're telling me to trust them?
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 11:49 am
it even states "It is premature to conclude that human activities--and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming--have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane activity.", you're doing a good job of refuting the poster.
terroraustralis - September 1, 2014, 11:44 am
strange, it doesnt say anywhere that not having a hurricane in any one year means that global warming isnt real... it just says that global warming will increase the frequency of strong hurricanes.
EmmaRoydes - August 31, 2014, 8:58 am
Sorry, that should have been *according to NOAA...
EmmaRoydes - August 31, 2014, 8:56 am
According to NASA: http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes
terroraustralis - August 31, 2014, 4:28 am
what do hurricanes have to do with global warming?
EmmaRoydes - August 30, 2014, 9:59 am
What does this poster have to do with the number of jobs?
terroraustralis - August 30, 2014, 1:11 am
to clarify, i dont like obama, and i dont like stupid bull****, and the notion that anyone has ever said "global warming means big hurricanes every year" is some REALLY stupid bull****.
terroraustralis - August 30, 2014, 1:09 am
if obama is getting rid of all the jobs, howcome you still have one?

New York City -

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around -

"Children won't know Snow" -


Liberals will go to great lengths -

Science states man is causing global warming -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

Zeitguy - June 21, 2014, 12:30 am
Unsure of your point. The nature of scientific process evolves as additional factors and evidence is revealed without prejudgment. Your posters exhibit the opposite approach.

Liberals need a crisis for control -

NEW VIDEO GAME FOR GREEN LEMMINGS - Cuz' we know that incandescent light bulbs are soooooooo evil (insert sarcasm here____.)

If Spring is here -

Obviously -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

crankyhead - November 20, 2013, 2:37 pm
I guess the trailer park doesn't teach you about fluctuations on linear graphs?
OTC - November 20, 2013, 11:51 am
I guess liberal schools don't teach about 'averages'?
crankyhead - November 20, 2013, 3:56 am
Obviously, the squiggly black line shouldn't be squiggly at all, if indded there is a 17 year pause. It should be flat. Obviously.
StoneTools - November 20, 2013, 1:04 am
but, but, but cranky says you aren't reading the data correctly.

AL GORE, FATHER OF GLOBAL WARNING - Cashes in by selling his network to the big evil oil empire of Al Jazerra. Al, can you say Hypocrite?

THAT IS WHY THEY ARE CALLED 3RD WORLD COUNTRIES - Their living standards and what they live in and utilize to live is completely different from ours.

BANKRUPTCY - you made the top 10

Maybe the earth doesn't have a fever... -

Global Warming Truth -

MF GLOBAL - guess what the MF stands for

Remember when? -

No Pain, No Gain -

global warming b/s -

SOPHISTICAL REFUTATIONS - 2300 years after Aristotle wrote this classic, a D science student still needs the argumentum ad populum and other logical fallacies to push the dead horse of man-made global warming. Because the data isn't there.


If you are 15 yrs old -

If its so scientific... -

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.8/5

More politifakes by OTC

Curlyrocks - May 22, 2014, 10:47 pm
There's a science to propaganda.