Over 59654

Hoax Politics

BLIZZARD OF 2013 - Global warming: causes less snow, except when it causes more snow!

TAGS: www www
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by JGalt

THE POLL RESULTS ARE IN! - 9 out of 10 Polar Bears surveyed think Al Gore is full of crap!

Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -

Warmist Insanity: Climate Change Is Causing Child Marriage -

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

INCONVENIENT TRUTH - Geologic history shows there is nothing "unprecedented" about today's temperatures or CO2 levels. Actually, we're still a bit on the low side.

Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward

VANISHING SEA ICE - Another stunning predictive success for Anthropogenic Global Warming Theory. Uh huh.

Eco-Pope Francis -

DEAR AL GORE - Effective immediately, please remove my name from the membership list of the Church of the Sacred Global Warming.

Idiot In Chief Obama -

Liberal Science Deniers -

SEA ICE VANISHING? - Only for the people that get their "science" from the "D" science student Al Gore. http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/SEAICE/ Case Closed.

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.8/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

StoneTools - June 28, 2013, 10:01 am
Wow! Me likey!
Capt. Morgan - January 29, 2013, 2:44 am
An interesting Olive Branch with wiggle room for both. But here is a hint - an article that will show you how to win over the folks open to persuasion: http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2013/01/Ridley-Ten-Tests.pdf
JGalt - January 28, 2013, 4:17 am
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 11:25 pm
Capt, lets end this. We both agree that global warming is occurring and that human activity maybe exacerbating a normal cyclical event. Fair enough?
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 7:42 pm
Sorry, double hit
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 7:41 pm
I thought you agreed that the earth has been warming over the last century.
Rudedog - January 27, 2013, 7:37 pm
I thought you agreed that the earth has been warming over the last century.

APPARENTLY THE SCIENCE IS NOT SETTLED - Former NASA scientists and astronauts send letter to NASA Administrator "We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”

UNPRECEDENTED WARMING! - You be the judge.

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

Renza - February 13, 2013, 10:32 pm
Cause failing to understand or acknowledge things makes them not true.

MILESTONES - Five years since a hurricane landfall in the United States. Hasn't happened since 1910-1914. The Prophecy Fail continues.

CLIMATE ALARMIST HYPOCRITES - 140 private jets, 1,200 limos and 40K tons of CO2. In one week these clowns will create a carbon footprint equal to the annual footprint of 30 small countries.

Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -


TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.75/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

Julie33 - August 21, 2014, 3:12 pm
Funny. hee hee Great! I don't agree with the politics around it but this still made me LOL. His reindeer should be tanning in the background. The only thing missing.

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)

Past liberal crisis predictions didn't happen -

GLOBAL WARMING PROTESTERS - What? The Earth's been cooling for 10 years? And there's a blizzard out there? And the Climate Change scientists have been cooking the books? We're still marching! I already got the permits!

Loony Liberals -

YET ANOTHER PROPHECY FAIL - Sea ice record set in 2010 (NASA's "warmest year ever") shattered just two years later. Search continues for the UN's 50 million climate refugees.

COLD AND SNOW RECORDS - According to Al Gore, they are caused by too much heat. Uh huh.

Climate Crusader DiCaprio -

OCTOBER 8TH WOLF CREEK, COLORADO - Earliest ever opening to ski season. How is that man-made global warming working for you?

2010 - Warmest ever? Unprecedented? Runaway warming? You humans have an amazingly short perspective. And for such big brains, some amazingly stupid ideas.

Climate Change Is The Global Crisis Key To Unlock The New World Order -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - May 5, 2015, 12:39 pm
Bottom line, the data was fudged. Lies Lies and d***ed lies.

2010 - NASA'S WARMEST YEAR EVER - Only by extensive data cherry-picking and manipulation. Apparently the calendars of Dr. James "Death Train" Hansen and his merry band of Druids don't go back very far.

RECORDS - Cold and snow records continue to fall across the northern hemisphere. How is that Global Warming working for you?

A BAGHDAD BOB MOMENT - Obama doubles down on the AGW Hoax and rushes towards his own Baghdad Bob moment in Copenhagen.

OSAMA BURIED AT SEA - Will this turn out to be a hoax too?

Yoda Wisdom -

EXTREME WEATHER RECORDS AND GLOBAL WARMING - Once again the data shows Anthropogenic Global Warming to be the Religion of the Stupid.

For a second there, -

Minnesota Fishing Season Opens May 11 -

Liberals will go to great lengths -

Liberals need a crisis for control -

ONE IN THE SAME - For 4 more? Just say no to the hoaxster

TAGS: www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

Man-made Global warming -

If its so scientific... -

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.8/5

More politifakes by OTC

Curlyrocks - May 22, 2014, 10:47 pm
There's a science to propaganda.

Arctic Melting -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

Rudedog - May 10, 2013, 1:11 am
Sorry Stoney, going to have to go back to the Sears catalog.
StoneTools - May 9, 2013, 11:53 pm
I was ok until you hit the internet p***.
Rudedog - May 9, 2013, 11:13 pm
If you can't believe scientific method than you are not allowed to watch TV, use a cell phone, or jack off to Internet p***.
JGalt - May 9, 2013, 11:12 pm
And scientists are being given two years to study why an insecticide now banned in the EU is killing off all the bees here? Junk Science...Don't you dare have thoughts contrary to the Gov't!
Curlyrocks - May 9, 2013, 10:00 pm
Couldn't have said it better myself. 5L

STOP GLOBAL WARMING - Live like Al Gore!

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by JGalt

One of 10 coldest winters in 100 years -

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 4.65/5

More politifakes by OTC

trapped in Antartica -

TAGS: www www www
Rating: 4.57/5

More politifakes by JGalt

fauxnews - January 9, 2014, 2:57 pm
Oh,you know Im not avoiding the question,Arnnatz. I proved 'that' many posts ago and on several occasions. Playing dumb might suit you well, ironically,for reasons other than your intention.However,it doesn't hide that it's enough you and I know the truth
OTC - January 9, 2014, 12:22 pm
Avoiding the question, shouldn't you be logged into your cranky account for that?
fauxnews - January 8, 2014, 10:37 pm
You're funny, Arnnatz. Pathological to a fault. And always a great source of amusement. You're a terrible liar..lolololol..
OTC - January 8, 2014, 12:37 pm
At least we agree that liberals don't have 'real' jobs, they leech off of the working class. BTW, can you prove I have multiple accounts, or are you just slandering as liberals do?
fauxnews - January 7, 2014, 1:49 am
Nah,OTC/Arnnatz, they're honorable people with 'real' jobs who have a life. They're not,you know, someone like 'you',a pathetic fail troll w/multiple accts who chronically trolls internet forums for a living because he's jealous of others with a real life
OTC - January 6, 2014, 11:51 pm
Are these the global warming idiots who thought the ice was melted and went to prove it? How much money did they cost us?
JGalt - January 5, 2014, 11:55 pm
we thinks you posted to the wrong thread. Thanks for playing.
fauxnews - January 5, 2014, 11:38 pm
...and why you lose them winnable election. It's called 'class', stupid. Got any?
fauxnews - January 5, 2014, 11:37 pm
why not just own up to it? You would earn respect rather than dig yourself a bigger hole. You are being a conscienceless pathetic jerk. The more you defend yourself, the bigger the fool you are.It's conservatives like you that give the brand a bad name...
JGalt - January 5, 2014, 10:39 pm
in anyone's eyes or voice.
JGalt - January 5, 2014, 10:39 pm
so are we not supposed to watch and laugh at TV comedies because those people could get hurt on the job too and they are risking their lives filming comedies for us? love the convoluted logic there buddy. Again- the singing video- not a lot of terror
Curlyrocks - January 5, 2014, 8:44 pm
The news makes it out that the passengers where more sad to leave than terrified. And the crew of any ice breaker is ready to be stuck in the ice at any given time and so I don't think either crew is too worried. But good to know sealers can count on you.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - January 5, 2014, 8:26 pm

Human life is human life, regardless of the outcome or who was involved this experience would have been terrifying for the people stuck out there and their families.
Curlyrocks - January 5, 2014, 8:08 pm
Something tells me that if it was sealers or whalers trapped in the ice they wouldn't receive this out pouring of sympathy and support.
JGalt - January 5, 2014, 12:47 am
Next time read the news and be informed before you step out on such thin ice!
JGalt - January 5, 2014, 12:47 am
did you see the crew videos- they were singing and having a grand old time- hardly life at risk. The crew stayed behind because there was NO risk according to news reports! Shame on you for trying to make it as a crisis to shame us with...
Curlyrocks - January 5, 2014, 12:31 am
No ones in any danger, The crew of the 1st ship are staying behind on board, there's no danger of either ships hulls failing due to ice, people are just having a bad month because they meant to study the retreating ice and got caught in it.. so yeah ha ha
Mooooooooooooooooooo - January 4, 2014, 10:24 pm

If this is what you find funny, you should be on a different network. the Motinetwork is better than this...better than you.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - January 4, 2014, 10:22 pm

I've never seen such low class disgusting comments. Curly and JGalt, you should be ashamed of yourselves, you put your own political opinions over the lives of innocent human beings? Mostly you Curly...sick, just sick.
fauxnews - January 4, 2014, 3:05 pm
It's lame, isn't mate? For example: If one of Obama's kids randomly perished one day,how much you wanna bet these wankers would be making posters making fun of it here? That's how you can separate the men from the freaks.True patriots have heart, not hate
Cyberhagen - January 4, 2014, 1:16 pm
Okay, I agree with you guys, but loving the story and it getting better? There are people trapped there who could have died, so don't get too happy about it, it doesn't make you look good to be gloating when the primary thing is the rescue effort.
JGalt - January 4, 2014, 10:04 am
Gore-bal warming I'm convinced of it! The carbon-credit multi-level market, er ponzi scheme...
Curlyrocks - January 3, 2014, 9:05 pm
This just gets better and better, now the ship that went to rescue them, a Chinese ice breaker is also stuck in the ice. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/antarctica/10548690/Antarctic-rescue-ship-now-stuck-in-ice.html
JGalt - December 31, 2013, 2:09 am
first in the 70's with rising C02 levels, scientists were predicting another ice age. THen it was Gore-bal warming, then climate change, Lets just call a spade a spade and call it weather!
Curlyrocks - December 30, 2013, 2:54 pm
I love this story, If you can't predict what the weather is going to do how can you be so sure it's doing it wrong, and that humans are the cause?

Wasn't long ago the top scientists thought the Earth was flat -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by OTC

fauxnews - March 11, 2015, 2:00 pm
Bogus links to non-scientific sites promoting a mindset not shared by the majority of the scientific community and typically promoted by fools and people with something to gain from continuing destructive practices regarding resources. Sorry,not buying it
fauxnews - March 11, 2015, 1:55 pm
TA was making fun of you trying to compare the state of science in the distant past to that of modern science - in that sense, it's not the same. A lot has changed since then. The only thing dumber than that is the fact that I have to explain that to you.
OTC - March 11, 2015, 1:43 pm
You're wrong faux, scientists didn't exist back then. It must be true, see first comment by TA
EmmaRoydes - October 20, 2014, 4:02 pm
The first one was from nsidc.org and the second one is from answers.com
EmmaRoydes - October 20, 2014, 3:50 pm
Its average thickness is about 1.6 km. The deepest known ice rests 2,555 meters below sea level, where the ice is over 4 kilometers thick.
EmmaRoydes - October 20, 2014, 3:49 pm
The ice cap that covers Antarctica is more than 2100 meters thick in places, more than two kilometers (1.3 miles). This is where most of the world's fresh water is contained. If it melted completely it would raise sea levels by 61 meters (200 feet).
EmmaRoydes - October 20, 2014, 3:40 pm
Antarctic ice is typically 1 to 2 meters (3 to 6 feet) thick, while most of the Arctic is covered by sea ice 2 to 3 meters (6 to 9 feet) thick. Some Arctic regions are covered with ice that is 4 to 5 meters (12 to 15 feet) thick.
OTC - October 20, 2014, 1:37 pm
Show me where i said CO2 isn't CO2 crank
crankyhead - October 12, 2014, 1:37 pm
Seeing as how ice forms on the surface of water, and not underneath it, and that volume is measured in three dimensions, whereas surface area is not, without accurately measuring the physical depth of the ice, what can we conclude about the data set?
crankyhead - October 12, 2014, 1:32 pm
No, actually, Emma put up a link that said the opposite of what SHE said it did. The rest of the conversation was just her trying to deflect the fact that she did it.
crankyhead - October 12, 2014, 1:30 pm
What are you referring to as false cause OTC? You're the guy promoting the 'CO2 isn't CO2' magical beans theory.
OTC - October 11, 2014, 1:16 pm
Cum hoc ergo propter hoc
OTC - October 11, 2014, 1:09 pm
So ER put up a link that said the opposite of what you said before you said it, impressive
Curlyrocks - October 10, 2014, 9:27 pm
Last I checked the maximum decline of the ice in summer was getting better and better. Still won't tell you how thick the ice is though.
Curlyrocks - October 10, 2014, 9:24 pm
I meant to say "various sources of CO2 but ran out of room and figured it could go 1st. We only got 255 letters to make our comments so they can't be too long and sometimes important words get lost. It reminds me of back in the day when I was a kid and...
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:43 pm
Speaking of sea ice, care to take a guess what the data from NASA says about that?
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:38 pm
So, you're just going to ignore it then, I see. Good for you Emma.
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:36 pm
and we all know that sea ice comes from warming temperatures, right?
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:36 pm
and you could go to the arctic sea ice news and a***ysis site and see that this year set a record in the amount of sea ice
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:33 pm
then again, you could go to this link: http://climate.nasa.gov/news/1141/ and see that they admit there's a pause
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:32 pm
Are you planning on addressing the temperature data I pulled from NASA, or are you going to be predictable and just pretend it doesn't exist?
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:31 pm
Which is it Emma? Does the data from NASA agree with your claim, or does it disagree with your claim? I'm not sure you understand the optics of pretending it does one and then the other. Just saying.
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:28 pm
How about looking at the first few graphs in that pdf ant realizing that they contradict your claim too?
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:27 pm
See the problem with NASA data yet?
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:26 pm
How about using the chart with just the title alone in this pdf: http://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/press_releases/lectures/Loeb_LaRC_Colloq.pdf
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:24 pm
You put up ONE link. I looked at it. I didn't say what you thought it said. I went and got a link from the same place that said the opposite of what you said. Can you see the problem with your logic yet?
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:23 pm
funny you should ignore the two pieces of information I put up, then whine about ignoring yours.
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:22 pm
Curious to note that you still don't want to talk about the temperature data that I found over at the NASA website. Care to explain why not?
Dwydwyyr - October 10, 2014, 2:20 pm
So no evidence then. Whut? There's no logic there, just (unsupported) belief since it is generally accepted that NASA stands behind the theory of man-made climate change. You cherry-picked post-hoc data. For a "flattened mouse" you are a big jacka$s. CWYL
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:13 pm
Let me guess… you're just going to ignore the proof from NASA I provided that actually shows the temperature, right? And then prance around claiming victory, all the while ignoring the glaring lacuna in your own logic?
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:11 pm
An intelligent person did figure it out, and that intelligent person is now trying to show you that the proof you provided doesn't support the claim you're making. *ahem*
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 2:10 pm
No, it doesn't, but if you look at the statement based on NASA data and the chart from NASA, an intelligent person could figure it out. Not that I'm accusing you of that.
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:05 pm
Here's the NASA proof that directly contradicts your 'uninformed opinion':http://climate.nasa.gov/system/downloadable_items/45_23_g-globalTemp-annual-l.jpg
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 2:03 pm
No, NASA is not in your b***. But your facts came from there. Your graph doesn't show a temperature correlation. When the 'fact' you're stating, isn't supported by the 'proof' you provide, one has to question your 'ability to understand the issue'.
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 1:58 pm
so I guess you are saying NASA is in my b***?
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 1:57 pm
CO2 Levels in a chart from NASA can be found at http://climate.nasa.gov/system/resources/detail_files/24_g-co2-l.jpg
EmmaRoydes - October 10, 2014, 1:55 pm
Citing the latest data from NOAA and NASA, Dr. David Whitehouse, an astrophysicist and academic advisor to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said that the 2013 global surface-temperature records from both entities show the “pause” in warming continues
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 1:08 pm
OK, OTC. In that case, seeing as how we're both alive right now, why don't you explain it to me. Seeing as how it's your theory and poor, simple me is having difficulty understanding it.
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 1:07 pm
I don't know where you pull your 'facts' from Emma, but in the future, do us all a favour, and try somewhere other than "from your b***". Because those are definitely not the facts.
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 1:05 pm
So yeah, 5L's for getting Emma to admit she doesn't have a basic comprehension of grade 10 chemistry either. No offence.
crankyhead - October 10, 2014, 1:04 pm
Curly, don't take this the wrong way, but there is no such thing as 'various CO2' Whether it comes out of a coal plant, a conservative, a cow or a car, CO2 looks and acts the same. Like this: O=C=O.
OTC - October 8, 2014, 10:37 pm
No they wouldn't be able to tell you because you weren't alive back then.
Dwydwyyr - October 8, 2014, 10:06 pm
Thank you "Emma" for helping me get elected. Could not have done it without you, skippy. Toasting you here in S****horpe as I type. TTFN
EmmaRoydes - October 8, 2014, 9:50 pm
EmmaRoydes - October 8, 2014, 9:49 pm
why don't you grow a set and actually login instead of just using the posting routine to put your comments up? Afraid to be exposed for someone who was banned?
EmmaRoydes - October 8, 2014, 9:47 pm
and that, cranky, is where everything goes haywire. The amount of CO2 in the last 20 years has been increasing, but the temperature hasn't been rising. Strange how facts work, eh?
EmmaRoydes - October 8, 2014, 9:45 pm
nice one curly! 5Ls for the comment!
Curlyrocks - October 8, 2014, 6:20 pm
I can't speak for the biospheres reaction to various CO2, but I can tell you that the scientists of that time didn't react to CO2 by panicking, blaming the rich, killing their industry. Good thing too or the Industrial revolution never would have happened
crankyhead - October 8, 2014, 3:48 pm
Hey OTC, do you think the scientists in 1492 would have been able to tell me how the biosphere knows enough to react to naturally occurring CO2, but not react to man made CO2? I mean, that really is a fascinating phenomenon, isn't it?
EmmaRoydes - October 7, 2014, 9:58 am
Especially if you discount the importance of Nicolaus Copernicus and Georg von Peuerbach.
OTC - October 7, 2014, 9:00 am
Now ER, we've determined that the term 'scientists' didn't exist in 1492 so logically neither did people who studied science
EmmaRoydes - October 6, 2014, 6:25 pm
oh, and the gutenberg press in 1450
EmmaRoydes - October 6, 2014, 6:24 pm
scientists were really scarce.
EmmaRoydes - October 6, 2014, 6:24 pm
the anemometer was invented in 1450, the Nürnberg Terrestrial Globe created during the years 1490-1492, England's first printing press in 1476, Da Vinci 1452-1519, did drawings of helicopter, parachute, submarine, centrifigal pump. Yeah, inventors and
EmmaRoydes - October 6, 2014, 6:18 pm
Must have been the switchover to the Gregorian calendar in 1582
EmmaRoydes - October 6, 2014, 6:16 pm
It also gets one threatened with physical violence
OTC - October 5, 2014, 9:22 am
I see, you "know" my I.Q. and how I am, and that's based on what, postings on the internet? Did you do any testing to get real data? Or do you just believe it because you don't like what I say? pseudoscience indeed
OTC - October 5, 2014, 9:11 am
Curly, it also gets you called a lot of names.
OTC - October 5, 2014, 12:14 am
TA says there were no scientists before 1600 and you say there were scientists in 1492, hmmm
OTC - October 5, 2014, 12:08 am
And you think I'm stupid? bwahahahaha
Curlyrocks - October 4, 2014, 11:31 pm
Exactly. 90% of those in the "scientific consensus" are just followers saying what they've been told or what will make them popular. Saying the earth is round used to get you burned at the stake but now saing GW isn't man made gets your funding stripped.
Curlyrocks - October 4, 2014, 11:31 pm
Exactly. 90% of those in the "scientific consensus" are just followers saying what they've been told or what will make them popular. Saying the earth is round used to get you burned at the stake but now saing GW isn't man made gets your funding stripped.
OTC - October 4, 2014, 6:23 pm
You mean the 'term' scientists didn't exist, doesn't mean science didn't exist, or maybe you are saying science didn't exist before 1600?
OTC - October 4, 2014, 6:19 pm
So science proved the earth was round yet the consensus in 1492 was that the earth was flat. Kinda like science proves the earth naturally heats up and cools down but the consensus is this cycle is man made
OTC - October 4, 2014, 6:15 pm
Must be that man made global warming thing. Oh wait! its Bush's fault, right?
OTC - October 4, 2014, 9:38 am
So I'm wrong about comment #71388? Please enlighten me Z
Zeitguy - October 3, 2014, 11:45 pm
OTC you are : "Other Than Correct".
Zeitguy - October 3, 2014, 11:42 pm
Curly you rock.
OTC - October 2, 2014, 5:33 pm
Scientific conscensious?
Curlyrocks - October 2, 2014, 11:07 am
The tropic of cancer, determined with shadows on the summer solstice that the distance between them would be 1/50th of 360 and paid a guy to count his steps as he walked from one to the other.
Curlyrocks - October 2, 2014, 11:04 am
Eratosthenes of Cyrene 276BC- 195BC was the first person to calculate the circumference of the Earth and calculate the tilt of the earth's axis. He did all of it by measuring the angle of the sun in 2 different citys in Egypt the southern of which was on
OTC - October 2, 2014, 8:33 am
3000 years? I thought Columbus sailed west in 1492 defying the flat earth concensus?
Zeitguy - October 2, 2014, 12:50 am
OTC you're better than that!
Zeitguy - October 2, 2014, 12:49 am
Such a ridiculous premise. A blatant attempt to discredit scientific conscensious with ideological rhetoric. Meh.
terroraustralis - October 1, 2014, 2:45 pm
3000 years is actually a pretty long time... and "Scientists" didnt exist until the 1600's when the scientific method was first created, as a result of the controversy over galileo's imprisonment by the catholic church, because the evidence backed galileo

EXTREME WEATHER! MORE TORNADOS! - NOAA reports 24 tornados in the US for July 2012. Average US July count from 1950-2010: 134 Search continues for UN's 50 million climate refugees.

WHEN ACTIVISM HIJACKS SCIENCE - “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is" - Dr David Viner Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia (UK Independent, March 20, 2000)



TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.26/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

fauxnews - August 8, 2014, 12:02 am
This is becoming a slow night at the improv. *chewing popcorn* *HECKLE COMEDIAN!* Come on, Foxy! We all love it when you do the sycophant thing! Show us some love! *woot!* *holler!* :-D
foxrecon19d - August 7, 2014, 11:58 pm
Ahhhh... did little Fauxy-wauxy not like the narrative being turned against him so much that he had to put words in the other person's mouth to that Fauxy could feel 'much better' about himself? GGGGRRRRRAAAA much, Faux? ...heh...heh...heh...
fauxnews - August 7, 2014, 11:54 pm
Correction: Fox meant to say,"Yup... it's next to your BIG rolodex of phrases full of TEA PARTY, AAAAAARRR!!! TEA PARTY, GGGRRRAAAA!!!!! TEA PARTY, AAAGGGGRRAAA!!! Watch and learn America! Sycophant with your new leftist narrative." There,much better :-)
fauxnews - August 7, 2014, 11:54 pm
Correction: Fox meant to say,"Yup... it's next to your BIG rolodex of phrases full of TEA PARTY, AAAAAARRR!!! TEA PARTY, GGGRRRAAAA!!!!! TEA PARTY, AAAGGGGRRAAA!!! Watch and learn America! Sycophant with your new leftist narrative." There, much better :-)
foxrecon19d - August 7, 2014, 11:52 pm
Yup... it's next to your BIG rolodex of phrases full of TEA PARTY, AAAAAARRR!!! TEA PARTY, GGGRRRAAAA!!!!! TEA PARTY, AAAGGGGRRAAA!!!
fauxnews - August 7, 2014, 3:39 pm
Do you have a little rolodex, Fox, with the phrases "left narrative" and "sycophant"readily handy so that when you on the losing end of an argument you can easy drop a fallacy,because 'thinking for yourself' simply hurts too much?Change the record already
foxrecon19d - August 7, 2014, 2:55 pm
So you are saying that your data based on your global warming 'scientists' that you have been preaching as scientific fact for 40 years has now been debunked by you because your old 'science' conflicts with your new leftist narrative.
Zeitguy - August 7, 2014, 11:49 am
I see that your argument is based on an isolated estimation made 40 years ago. Try checking the cumulative evidence over the last 15 years.

INEVITABLE RESULTS - This is what happens when 40% of the corn crop is used to fuel cars instead of people. Another gift to the developing world from the "We Care More" Environmentalists.

GLOBAL WARMING MELTING GREENLAND? - That's how an aircraft abandoned on top of the glacier in 1942 is discovered buried under 268 feet of ice 50 years later. Google "Glacier Girl".

Climate Change Alarmist Data Manipulation -

COLD AND SNOW EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING - Next they will be telling us that drinking beer gives you a flat tummy.

TAGS: www www www www
Rating: 4.1/5

More politifakes by Capt. Morgan

RonaldReagan - May 18, 2014, 4:08 pm
Funny. Doesn't do that for me


TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 4.02/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 4:02 pm
oooooooo, looks like your but.tons got mashed really hard this time. Just chill out and go outside and get some fresh air. It will probably dry the frustration tears off your face.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 3:58 pm
Sounds like you are describing yourself in #77017.
rebeccaolsen - June 9, 2015, 2:56 pm
:) Right Back Atcha.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:54 pm
So we will see. I get bored of this stuff easily. But do not worry - I will be sure to drop in now and again. Have a good one, Rebecca. Hugs and kisses.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:52 pm
I never said I was leaving the site. That is just wishing thinking on EMMa's part.I was just pointing out how he proved my point in my “gag.” There is no need to beat a dead horse’s @$$.As for me,I lurk on the Facebook side.Active elsewhere on the network
rebeccaolsen - June 9, 2015, 2:47 pm
You are not leaving us, are you? :( Please stay. I took comment #77001 to mean you were done milking our lolcow for that gag.
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:34 pm
*face palm* Just when I think you cant outdo yourself,this[#77013].Your personality disorder makes you say the dumbest sh**.You've proven to be a weakminded coward with more lying to cover your ineptitude.You make this too easy.As I said,enjoy your denial
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:27 pm
So you are begging[#77015] for peanut now, Bubbles? lololol Sorry, like I said, game over.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:23 pm
by the way, didn't you say, in the other thread, that it was game over, that you were no longer playing? What happened with that cabana boy?
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:22 pm
site, but that's on you.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:22 pm
And you took that to mean that I think you are smart?!? If I say the dead tree has an IQ of say 35 and you have an IQ of 37, you are above a dead tree, but waaaaay below a normal thinking human. That probably went over your head like any comment on this
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:55 pm
you were very clear on that.You’ve hardly“avoided me” so, according to you,I am one of the smart ones in your book. In your quest to depict yourself as tough, you proved yourself to be weak-minded when trying to cover up your ineptitude. Enjoy your denial
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 1:46 pm
you might come from a position of power if you believed that.You don't.You actually hold me in very high regard, and my intellect ^_^ you said,[#76699]"some on this site have the IQ of a dead tree in the middle of a desert. Those are the people I avoid.”
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 8:07 am
Once again, your broken record comes into play...caw...skip...caw...skip...
guest818 - June 9, 2015, 2:19 am
bu.tton push overload. Calm down, Bubbles. they are just posters.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 9, 2015, 2:08 am
I know, I know! Neither one exists

WINTER 2010-11 - Cold and snow records being erased faster than Obama bumper stickers.

ANOTHER GLOBAL WARMING PROPHECY FAIL - Record snow bases at Vail, Loveland, Mammoth Mountain, Squaw Valley, Arapahoe, Snowbird, and probably a few others. Many plan to stay open into July.


One-in-Five Americans Believe Man-Made Climate Change is a hoax -

TAGS: www www www www www
Rating: 2.25/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 8, 2014, 8:57 pm
You arguing with the voices in your head again? lol... Or just "Fauxnews" withdrawal? ;-p This poster was SO yesterday. No matter. Will make some more. My gift to y'all. Merry Xmas! :-D
EmmaRoydes - July 8, 2014, 7:55 pm
Kind of like writing (_|_)theists instead of atheists
EmmaRoydes - July 8, 2014, 7:53 pm
Xtian faith? WTH is that? Some zulu belief? Pigmy? I've never heard of it. Or are you just too lazy or afraid to type the whole word out?
Bandit5906 - July 5, 2014, 7:13 pm
What faux scandals. They all see quite real.
fauxnews - July 5, 2014, 5:51 pm
Curly....why would anyone in their right mind 'want' to believe that President Obama is a "muslim"? Certainly the facts don't bear it out. Republican congressmen in his own govt acknowledge his Xtian faith. At this point, it's your bias.
Curlyrocks - July 5, 2014, 5:44 pm
Does this apply to Canadians too? I had no idea I was such a racist. Here I am taking on my own people (Ontario Libertarians) when it turns out I'm a racist and should just join them.
EmmaRoydes - July 5, 2014, 5:23 pm
or this: http://www.angusreidglobal.com/polls/48745/less-than-half-in-u-s-and-britain-believe-in-man-made-climate-change/
JGalt - July 5, 2014, 5:23 pm
how about focusing upon the poor leadership vs all the faux indignation and faux scandals?
EmmaRoydes - July 5, 2014, 5:22 pm
You need to do some homework. The polls in the UK say the same thing about the UK. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_opinion_by_country

Global Warning! -

Science, leftist liberal style -

Global Warning! -

Global Warning! -

Global Warning! -

Global Warning! -

Global Warning! -

Obama's Global Warming Stupidity -

liberal science -

Uh-oh, Greenies! -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - March 28, 2015, 12:15 pm
I used to make this argument myself but actually, it does burn less and is more efficient to have one large plant everyone ***s into, rather than run millions of independent, small internal combustion engines. It's probably not a large difference though.

Al "Not So Sharp" Sharpton -

Democrat War On Coal -

Global Warming Junk Science -

The Ever-Greater Pause -

The Father of Global Warming -

Commiefornia Gov. Moonbeam Proves Yet Again He's a Moronic Moonbat -

Has Anybody Told the DNC What Obama’s EPA Just Announced About Airplane Emissions? -

The Father of Global Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

GloBULL Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

The Father of Global Warming -

2014 Was NOT The Warmest Year Ever -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - March 21, 2015, 11:18 pm
You forgot to account for the "data adjustment: that turned a cooling trend into a warming trend.

man isn't causing global warming -

An Inconvenient Truth -

Whiny Liberal Crybabies Throw a Wet Blanket on the 4th of July Because It's Bad for Gaia -

Climate Change -

1970s Flashback -

Climategate -

I'll Observe Earth Day... -

Wacky Warmists -

EPA's Green Tyranny -

Greenpeace Hypocrisy -

Climate Change Idiocy -

Climate Change Clown -

UN Climate Czar: Communism is Best to Fight Global Warming -

EPA Tyrant: "Yes, Our New Regulations Are Going to Make Lower Income People Take it in the A$$" -

Another Failed Global Warming Prediction -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

OTC - June 13, 2015, 11:02 pm
I recently read a blog from 2008 that ended with "put the final nail in the coffin of global cooling." There hasn't been any warming in the past 18 years, and that blog was 7 yrs ago. That must be some sweet tasting kool-aid

Stupid Climate Alarmists -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 5:29 pm
What about it would "tick me" off, Curly? :) I rarely comment on his "parodies." Anytime I am having a restless night and in need of a sedative, I always know where to turn - albeit, these short-form ones are an anomaly, being the exception to that rule.
Curlyrocks - May 7, 2015, 5:08 pm
I know what you mean. I was going to blow by it, saw that something about it had ticked you you off, read it, and gave it 5L. Well said CI
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 11:23 am
I love it how, regardless of our all differences, we are all in agreement (mostly through habit) to ignore the "contributions" from… wait for it… dunh dunh dunh…. TheConservativeInsurgent :)

Apollo 7 Astronaut: Climate Alarmism Is the ‘Biggest Fraud in the Field of Science’ -

TAGS: www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www www
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 4, 2015, 12:17 am
Looks like An Appeal to Irrelevant Authority with a side of Person Credulity.