epic fail
military funny
stupid human

Comment on this Politifake

yes, I promise

Creator: JohnGalt

 Comment using Facebook

fauxnews - July 2, 2016, 12:13 pm,
Citation? Trump also once met with the Clintons a few years back and actually said,"Hillary would make a great President". So, if that proof of Trump in a conspiracy with the dems? ... Loretta Lynch made it clear she plans 2 follow the FBI recommendations
Cyberhagen - July 2, 2016, 12:44 pm,
What does that have to do with this? Is Trump in office? No. Lynch is. It's a clear conflict of interest.
fauxnews - July 2, 2016, 6:04 pm,
Not if she promises to go ahead with the recommendations of the F.B.I. investigations. Only then, if they recommend indictment, and she backtracks, can you allege that claim. Let us see how this plays out.You'll allege a conspiracy anyways in either event
JohnGalt - July 3, 2016, 1:59 am,
that was only part of the quote the rest of it was something to the effect that her senior staff would double-check it to make sure its correct. We'll see if they pass and then agents start leaking the dirty details and start resigning due to
JohnGalt - July 3, 2016, 2:00 am,
to the biased corruption in that office the past 7 years.
fauxnews - July 3, 2016, 12:32 pm,
The "only part" of the quote, as in the entire quote on your meme, is a lie. Clinton and Loretta Lynch never said this. If the F.B.I. recommends indictment and Lynch balks, then you may have a point.For now,it's just your typical conspiracy theory junk
JohnGalt - July 3, 2016, 8:49 pm,
as are most of your posts (way out of reality). It's called parody, and political sarcasm, my friend.
fauxnews - July 3, 2016, 11:46 pm,
I don't espouse conspiracy theories. I spend most of my time here mocking them. If this meme was the only one exaggerating the facts for a joke, I wouldn't have mentioned it. Most of your memes are regurgitated conspiracy theories. They're hardly parody
JohnGalt - July 4, 2016, 7:34 pm,
conspiracy theories? I guess the term "conflict of interest" and "recusal" are not part of your vocabulary, then
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 1:37 am,
I was speaking about the majority of your memes. And in this meme, since there's no punchline, you are suggesting that Clinton and Lynch actually had this conversation. If it was just lying propaganda, same class of rotten thinking.(1/2)
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 1:39 am,
As for the "conflict of interest" or "recusal", you are jumping the gun. The F.B.I. hasn't made its recommendation yet. If they recommend criminal charges, and Lynch balks though she promised to follow their lead, THEN you can make this claim.(2/2)
JohnGalt - July 5, 2016, 6:44 am,
um, one would expect before any 'decision' (such as an active investigation) that people would decide on recusal or conflict of interest, to avoid the appearance of any improprieties. Funny how you liberals side with each other and don't see
JohnGalt - July 5, 2016, 6:46 am,
the potential conflict in an active investigation, before any decisions are made. progressives sure would get upset if it was a conservative acting the same way though!
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 1:05 pm,
Loretta Lynch is not the F.B.I. They are doing the investigation. Not her. And who cares about them avoiding the appearance of any improprieties?" No matter WHAT they do so or say, you Republicans have already made up your mind...
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 1:08 pm,
...that Obama was born in Kenya and an ISIS sympathizer with NO evidence.Again,if the F.B.I. recommends 'indictment' and Lynch balks at that, after promising to do what they say, then you may have a point. And if the F.B.I. recommends NO indictments...
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 1:10 pm,
...then you Republicans will allege a conspiracy based on emotional reasoning and no evidence. Look, this is why we have elections. No matter what, both sides can only agree to disagree.And if Trump wins or loses,the losers are bound by the decision...
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 1:12 pm,
...In other words,'reality' enters into this at one point or another, and we've all agreed to be bound by the facts that ground it by the democratic process involved.No meme or comment board comment can change that.Food for thought ;^)
JohnGalt - July 5, 2016, 10:51 pm,
Too Big to Jail? blackmail? Job security?
JohnGalt - July 5, 2016, 10:54 pm,
" there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Other lowly gov't employess get fined/jailed for falling short of this quotation! different rules for different people!
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 11:23 pm,
I don't think the email thing is as big as deal as you guys make it. Sure, the Clinton's are brats and here's yet another example of it. But nothing serious came of this vanilla corruption. No one was hurt by it. And we aren't the F.B.I...
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 11:25 pm,
...the process by which the F.B.I. came to its conclusions is fully transparent and doesn't suggest anything in the way of collusion. It's simply a boring and benign controversy in every sense. Compare this to say Dennis Hastert's child molestation...
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 11:31 pm,
...or Anthony's Weiner's indiscretions, and this simply doesn't matter. Yes, politicians are corrupt. But, man, if this bothers you and Trump's equally if not more disturbing behavior doesn't bother you,then you're simply too partisan 2 be taken seriously
fauxnews - July 6, 2016, 2:38 am,
P.S. Might be a good time to remind you that the man who recommended NO indictments was/is Comey, who is a REPUBLICAN, and that FBI directors are given 10-year terms to a**ure independence. So Obama couldn't have "rigged" the outcome (1/2)
fauxnews - July 6, 2016, 2:42 am,
His reasoning, which I buy, is that "extremely careless" falls short of "gross negligence." And "extreme carelessness doesn't translate into gross negligence w/o evidence of willful intent." She's not a spy.Just a dumb [email protected]*yawn*(2/2)
JohnGalt - July 6, 2016, 6:41 am,
please show me that interpretation under 18 USC 793, as I cannot find it. Thanks for playing, as the fix IS IN.
JohnGalt - July 6, 2016, 6:44 am,
when you read the entire code, I guess it depends upon the meaning of the word "IS".
fauxnews - July 6, 2016, 1:15 pm,
The F.B.I. director is a Republican. He made the recommendation. And FBI directors are given 10-year terms to insure independence. So the GOP is now part of your conspiracy?lol Your only evidence of "a fix" is that the outcome didn't favor YOUR politics
fauxnews - July 6, 2016, 1:20 pm,
The Republican FBI director recommended NO indictments.A fact you conveniently ignore.Most of America also doesn't care about this boring controversy,reflected by Trump poor standing in the polls.Sry,you wont change the nation's mind on "Politifake" LOL
JohnGalt - July 5, 2016, 10:58 pm,
fauxnews - July 5, 2016, 11:31 pm,
Gee...a source from a website called "Young Conservatives". Wonder if their opinion is biased on this :rolleyes:
Start new comment thread
Register in seconds...
Log In